Abstract:Global economy imbalance is a hidden danger in the world economic growth.It is also a hot topic to discuss in the academic and political circles,which is embodied in the continuous growth of the U.S.current account deficit and trade deficit,in China and other East Asian countries' excessive deposit,huge trade surplus and foreign exchange reserve as well.Nowadays,scholars have divided into two groups in the issue of how to decrease this imbalance.Some U.S.official economists argued that the primary cause of global economy imbalance is due to the excessive deposit and foreign exchange reserve of East Asian countries.They suggest that these East Asian countries,especially China,adjust their economy first.Other foreign economists and some U.S.economists have an opposite viewpoint that the huge U.S.fiscal and trade deficits have caused the global economy imbalance and that adjusting the U.S.economy is a more effective way to change the imbalance.Using the Granger Causality test to study the U.S.trade deficit and the long-term interest rate mechanism,we find that the change of U.S.long-term interest rate could be the Granger cause of the trade deficit change.But on the contrary,trade deficit change does not have much influence on the long-term interest rate.This one-way influence has a certain time lag.The influence will be most obvious when the time lag is three months and will then weaken gradually.According to this result,we can draw the conclusion that the adjustment by the U.S.government to raise the interest rates and reduce the fiscal deficits will be most effective in decreasing the global economy imbalance.However,the final alignment procedure needs various countries' participation and the developing countries may have more pressure in the economic adjustment as the United States may not be so affirmative in adjusting its economy for its own benefit.In this condition,China must take appropriate adjustment in its economy,not only for the world but also for itself.Some policies should be established such as RMB appreciation,monetary cooperation in East Asia,etc.

Does the China-U.S. Trade Imbalance Stem from Difference in the Comparative Advantages of Service Trade? Empirical Analysis Based on SVAR Model

Trade Statistical Discrepancies and U.S.-China Trade Balance Issues

Understanding the Global Imbalance from the Perspective of Processing Trade Value Added of China

Anti-Comparative Advantage: A Puzzle in U.S.-China Bilateral Trade

U.S.-China Trade Deficit: An Empirical Research

Comparative advantage, service trade, and global imbalances

Economic Development Pattern and Trade Imbalance: Comparing the U.S. with East Asia

Research on the Causes of China's Trade Surplus:Empirical Analysis Based on Intertemporal Optimizing Model of Consumption

What determines China's trade balance dynamics: a disaggregate analysis of panel data

Empirical Study on the Impact of US FDI on China-US Bilateral Trade Imbalances

What accounts for China's trade balance dynamics?

An Analysis on Underlying Causes of Sino-US Trade Surplus

Anti-Comparative Advantage:A Puzzle in China-U.S.Bilateral Trade

Should Chinese Renminbi be Blamed for Its Trade Surplus? A Structural VAR Approach

The U.S.-China Trade Balance and RMB's Exchange Rate: an Empirical Analysis

Comparative Advantage, Endowment Structure, and Trade Imbalances

Determinants of China's bilateral trade balance in global value chains

Causes of Global Economy Imbalance and Its Adjustment——A Study Based on the Causality Test of US Trade Deficit and Long-Term Interest Rate

Revealed Comparative Advantage, Intra Industry Trade and the Us Manufacturing Trade Deficit with China

US–China external imbalance and the global financial crisis 1

Correcting China's trade imbalance: Monetary means will not suffice