Abstract:Three major concerns drove the U.S. into initiating the trade war, and they are (a) the concern that China’s chronically large trade surplus was depressing job creation in the U.S. (b) the concern that China was using illegal and unfair methods to acquire U.S. technology at an effectively discounted price; and (c) the concern that China seeks to weaken U.S. national security and its international standing. On the dispute over China’s exchange rate and trade imbalance, the first conclusion is that it was marked by analytical confusion over the meaning of the term ‘equilibrium exchange rate’. The second conclusion is that China’s trade imbalance reflects the economic conditions in both China and U.S., and that the efficient and fair solution of the problem requires policy changes in both countries. On the industrial policy dispute, the first conclusion is that the issue of forced technology transfer is largely a dispute about China using its market power to benefit itself at the expense of its trade partners. The second conclusion is that China’s use of market power can last only until the other large countries could unite and retaliate as a group. The inevitability of retaliation means that China should replace the joint-venture (JV) mechanism for technological diffusion with other ways to strengthen its technological capability. On the U.S. concern about whether China trade weakens its national security, the first conclusion is that the notion of national security that is commonly adopted in the U.S. trade policy debate is ignorant about the primary determinants of U.S. capability in innovation. By focusing instead mainly on how to hold down China technologically, the long-run outcome will be a technologically weaker U.S. and hence, a more vulnerable U.S. The second conclusion is that the U.S. must identify a clear, short list of critical technologies and critical infrastructure for the recently reformed Committee for Foreign Investment in the United States (CFIUS) to cover, and update this list constantly. Otherwise, the broad and changing nature of notions about national security would allow the bureaucratically driven phenomenon of mission-creep to steadily expand the coverage of the CFIUS process, thereby steadily rendering CFIUS to be operationally capricious. Our principal policy suggestion to China is that, because China’s economy in 2018 is very different from that in 1978 (e.g. many parts of China now look like Singapore and China is Africa’s biggest donor), there should be more reciprocity in China’s trade and investment relations with the advanced economies despite China’s status as a developing economy under WTO rules. Our principal policy suggestion to President Trump is to stop equating strategic competition with economic competition. Strategic competition is normally a zero-sum game. While fair economic competition is usually a zero-sum game in the short run, it generally creates a win-win outcome in the long run.

An Analysis on Underlying Causes of Sino-US Trade Surplus

Theoretical analysis on Trade Surplus

Trade Surplus in China: Reason and Countermeasures

On the Objective Necessity of Sino-US Trade Imbalance

Understanding the recent Sino-U.S. trade conflict

A Query to the Paper “are the Forces That Cause China's Trade Surplus with the USA Good?”

Analysis of the Causes and Countermeasures of the Escalation of Sino-US Trade Friction

Analysis on the economic effect of Sino-US trade friction from the perspective of added value

Trade Statistical Discrepancies and U.S.-China Trade Balance Issues

Are the forces that cause China's trade surplus with the USA good?

Analysis on the Causes and Countermeasures of Sino-US Trade Friction

Analysis of the Psychological, Institutional and Political Factors for the Causes of Sino-US Trade Frictions

Anti-Comparative Advantage: A Puzzle in U.S.-China Bilateral Trade

Understanding the U.S.-China Trade War

The Causes and Solutions of the China-US Trade War

Research on the differences and Countermeasures of Sino U.S. economic and trade negotiations

U.S.-China Trade Deficit: An Empirical Research

Research on the Causes of China's Trade Surplus:Empirical Analysis Based on Intertemporal Optimizing Model of Consumption

Turning One's Loss Into a Win? The US Trade War With China in Perspective

U.S. Export Controls and the Issue of the Sino-U.S. Trade Balance

Anti-Comparative Advantage:A Puzzle in China-U.S.Bilateral Trade