Abstract:Several studies highlight the importance of the order of different instructional methods when designing learning environments. Correct but also erroneous worked examples are frequently used methods to foster students' learning performance, especially in problem-solving. However, so far no study examined how the order of these example types affects learning. While the expertise reversal effect would suggest presenting correct examples first, the productive failure approach hypothesizes the reversed order to be learning-facilitating. In addition, congruency of subsequent exemplified problems was tested as a moderator of the effect of order on learning. For example, with arithmetic tasks, congruent problems target exactly the same calculation while incongruent problems refer to different calculations. Following cascade theory, a model of cognitive skill acquisition, presenting correct examples first should be more effective when the subsequent exemplified problems are different. To test the (conflicting) hypotheses, 83 university students were assigned to one of the four conditions in a 2 (correct vs. erroneous example first) × 2 (same vs. different exemplified problems) between-subject design. Learners navigated through a slideshow on the topic of Vedic mathematics consisting of explicit instruction, worked examples differing in terms of the experimental condition, and transfer problems. Although no main or interaction effects were found regarding students' learning performance, mediational analysis offered support for the expertise reversal effect, as it indicated that there is a significant indirect effect of order via mental load on learning. Presenting correct examples first and erroneous examples second resulted in a lower mental load, which in turn was associated with better learning performance. In contrast, presenting erroneous examples first and correct examples second resulted in a more accurate self-assessment of learning performance. These findings offer first insights into the question of how the presentation order of different example types impacts learning and provide practical recommendations for the design of educational media. Results are discussed in light of the ongoing debate regarding the question if less guided instructional methods should precede or succeed more guided methods.

Direct instruction, worked examples and problem solving: The impact of instructional strategies on cognitive load

The effects of example-free instruction and worked examples on problem-solving

Cognitive Load Theory and the Format of Instruction

Understanding instructional design effects by differentiated measurement of intrinsic, extraneous, and germane cognitive load

Effects of different ratios of worked solution steps and problem solving opportunities on cognitive load and learning outcomes

Research on Effective Instructional Design Based on Cognitive Load Theory

The influence of the order and congruency of correct and erroneous worked examples on learning and (meta-)cognitive load

Cognitive load theory and individual differences

Cognitive load theory: Practical implications and an important challenge

Cognitive load theory: implications of cognitive load theory on the design of learning

Cognitive Load Theory and Its Relationships with Motivation: a Self-Determination Theory Perspective

Greater Cognitive Effort for Better Learning: Tailoring an Instructional Design for Learners with Different Levels of Knowledge and Motivation

Empirical Investigation of Cognitive Load Theory in Problem Solving Domain

Learning declarative and procedural knowledge via video lectures: cognitive load and learning effectiveness

Cognitive Load Theory: How Many Types of Load Does It Really Need?

The Interplay of Cognitive Load, Learners' Resources and Self-regulation

A Reconsideration of Cognitive Load Theory

A systematized review of cognitive load theory in health sciences education and a perspective from cognitive neuroscience

Cognitive load and instructionally supported learning with provided and learner-generated visualizations

Cognitive Load Influenced the Pupill's Strategies Selection of Distributing Working Memory Resources