Abstract:Cognitive load theory suggests that effective instructional material facilitates learning by directing cognitive resources toward activities that are relevant to learning rather than toward preliminaries to learning. One example of ineffective instruction occurs if learners unnecessarily are required to mentally integrate disparate sources of mutually referring information such as separate text and diagrams. Such split-source information may generate a heavy cognitive load, because material must be mentally integrated before learning can commence. This article reports findings from six experiments testing the consequences of split-source and integrated information using electrical engineering and biology instructional materials. Experiment 1 was designed to compare conventional instructions with integrated instructions over a period of several months in an industrial training setting. The materials chosen were unintelligible without mental integration. Results favored integrated instructions throughout the 3-month study. Experiment 2 was designed to investigate the possible differences between conventional and integrated instructions in areas in which it was not essential for sources of information to be integrated to be understood. The results suggest that integrated instructions were no better than split-source information in such areas. Experiments 3, 4, and 5 indicate that the introduction of seemingly useful but nonessential explanatory material (e.g., a commentary on a diagram) could have deleterious effects even when presented in integrated format. Experiment 6 found that the need for physical integration was restored if the material was organized in such a manner that individual units could not be understood alone. In light of these results and previous findings, suggestions are made for cognitively guided instructional packages.

Greater Cognitive Effort for Better Learning: Tailoring an Instructional Design for Learners with Different Levels of Knowledge and Motivation

Teaching Design Principles of Motor Skills from Perspective of Cognitive Load Theory

When is Learning "Effortful"? Scrutinizing the Concept of Mental Effort in Cognitively Oriented Research from a Motivational Perspective

Understanding instructional design effects by differentiated measurement of intrinsic, extraneous, and germane cognitive load

Cognitive load theory and individual differences

A systematized review of cognitive load theory in health sciences education and a perspective from cognitive neuroscience

Cognitive-Load Theory: Methods to Manage Working Memory Load in the Learning of Complex Tasks

Cognitive load theory: implications of cognitive load theory on the design of learning

Cognitive load theory: Practical implications and an important challenge

The cognitive load effect in working memory: Refreshing the empirical landscape, removing outdated explanations

Cognitive Load Theory and the Format of Instruction

Cognitive Architecture and Instructional Design: 20 Years Later

Use of Eye-Tracking Technology to Investigate Cognitive Load Theory

Research on cognitive load theory and its design implications for e-learning

Effects of different ratios of worked solution steps and problem solving opportunities on cognitive load and learning outcomes

Something old, something new from cognitive load theory

Cognitive Load Theory and Its Relationships with Motivation: a Self-Determination Theory Perspective

Cognitive Load Theory: New Directions and Challenges

How Does Cognitive Load Interact with Self-Regulated Learning? A Dynamic and Integrative Model

Synthesizing Cognitive Load and Self-regulation Theory: a Theoretical Framework and Research Agenda