THE STATUS OF THEORY AND PRACTICE IN ANCIENT, ISLAMIC AND MEDIEVAL LATIN CONTEXTS
Jens Høyrup
2003-01-01
Abstract:As all contributors to the present volume know, Laura Toti Rigatelli has worked in in various fields within the history of mathematics. However, my own working catalogue, my bookshelves and my archive indicate clearly that what has affected me most is her work on the late medieval and Renaissance Italian practitioners' abbaco tradition. My homage to her will therefore deal with the status of practitioners' knowledge. It is to a large extent to the credit of Laura Toti Rigatelli (together with Raffaella Franci and Gino Arrighi) that interest in practical mathematics is not uncommon within Italian historiography of mathematics. In the perspective of the global community of historians of mathematics, however, things appear to look different; here, work on theoretical knowledge by far overshadows that on the knowledge of pratitioners. Moreover, since the knowledge of specialists' crafts is generally considered of scarce interest, it is largely overlooked that it was largely independent of what we are accustomed to see as contemporary "scientific knowledge", at least during the pre-Modern epoch and to some extent even later, but that it is none the less not to be understood as mere and general "folk knowledge". As Laura Toti Rigatelli I have mainly approached the relationship between the two types and organizations of knowledge from the point of view of mathematics, which is the field I know best (Høyrup 1990; 1997a). This may be claimed to have distorted my view, since a corpus of knowledge as coherent as that of "scientific" (Euclidean, Archimedean, etc.) mathematics is not found in other fields in the pre-Modern world. Scientific mathematics can be argued to have taken over material and inspiration from the practical traditions and to have digested it in such a way that wholly new structures emerged; In other fields, "philosophers" made common-sense use within their own framework of every-day observations or of knowledge deriving from the practical traditions - but they did not transform this borrowed knowledge radically.