Abstract:Background: Recent U.S. immigration policy has increasingly focused on asylum deterrence and has been used extensively to rapidly deport and deter asylum-seekers, leaving thousands of would-be asylum-seekers waiting indefinitely in Mexican border cities, a large and growing proportion of whom are pregnant and parenting women. In the border city of Tijuana, Mexico, these women are spending unprecedented durations waiting under unsafe humanitarian conditions to seek safety in the U.S, with rising concerns regarding increases in gender-based violence (GBV) among this population during the COVID-19 pandemic. Given existing gaps in evidence, we aimed to describe the lived experiences of GBV in the context of asylum deterrence policies among pregnant and parenting asylum-seeking women at the Mexico-U.S. border. Methods: Within the community-based Maternal and Infant Health for Refugee & Asylum-Seeking Women (MIHRA) study, we conducted semi-structured qualitative interviews with 30 asylum-seeking women in Tijuana, Mexico between June and December 2022. Eligible women had been pregnant or postpartum since March 2020, were 18-49 years old, and migrated for the purposes of seeking asylum in the U.S. Drawing on conceptualizations of structural and legal violence, we conducted a thematic analysis of participants' experiences of GBV in the context of asylum deterrence policies and COVID-19. Results: Pregnant and parenting asylum-seeking women routinely faced multiple forms of GBV perpetuated by asylum deterrence policies at all stages of migration (pre-migration, in transit, and in Tijuana). Indefinite wait times to cross the border and inadequate/unsafe shelter exacerbated further vulnerability to GBV. Repeated exposure to GBV contributed to poor mental health among women who reported feelings of fear, isolation, despair, shame, and anxiety. The lack of supports and legal recourse related to GBV in Tijuana highlighted the impact of asylum deterrence policies on this ongoing humanitarian crisis. Conclusion: Asylum deterrence policies undermine the health and safety of pregnant and parenting asylum-seeking women at the Mexico-U.S. border. There is an urgent need to end U.S. asylum deterrence policies and to provide respectful, appropriate, and adequately resourced humanitarian supports to pregnant and parenting asylum-seeking women in border cities, to reduce women's risk of GBV and trauma.

Credibility, Trauma, and the Law: Domestic Violence-Based Asylum Claims in the United States

(In)credible Violence: An Analysis of Post-Alvarado Domestic Violence Asylum Cases in the United States

Erasing violence: lesbian women asylum applicants in the United States

Women Refugees and the Development of US Asylum Law: 1980-present

Persecution as stigma-driven trauma: Social determinants, stigma, and violence in asylum seekers in the United States

Bias, Consistency, and Partisanship in U.S. Asylum Cases: A Machine Learning Analysis of Extraneous Factors in Immigration Court Decisions

Remolding the court: The need for forward‐thinking evidentiary and sentencing practices in domestic violence cases with battered women

Supporting Asylum Seekers: Clinician Experiences of Documenting Human Rights Violations Through Forensic Psychological Evaluation

Explaining Asylum Law Using Qualitative Comparative Analysis

Clinical and Legal Considerations When Optimizing Trauma Narratives in Immigration Law Evaluations

Trauma in the American asylum process: Experiences of immigrant families under the migrant protection protocols.

Trends in the qualification of asylum claims related to gender-based violence under international and European Law

What Torture Survivors Teach Assessors About Being More Fully Human

Use of immigration status for coercive control in domestic violence protection orders

"When you leave your country, this is what you're in for": experiences of structural, legal, and gender-based violence among asylum-seeking women at the Mexico-U.S. border

The uneven geography of asylum and humanitarian relief: place-based precarity for Central American migrant youth in the United States judicial system

Ask a Feminist: Deborah Anker Discusses Gender and Asylum Law

The Symbolic Life of Courts: How Judicial Language, Actions, and Objects Legitimize Credibility Assessments of Asylum Appeals

“He Said They’d Deport Me”

A Qualitative Exploration of the Premigration Victimization Experiences of Sexual and Gender Minority Refugees and Asylees in the United States and Canada

The Coalescence of United States Immigration Law and International Criminal Law: An Exploration of Elias Zacarias in the Context of Female Genital Mutilation