Abstract:Objective: Half a century of sexual exploitation research has accumulated a remarkable knowledge base. However, glaring shortcomings exist: unsatisfactory justice outcomes, prevention programs not proven effective at controlling sexually exploitative behavior, and victims feeling underserved or harmed. Because these outcomes exist despite $7B expended through the Violence Against Women Act (VAWA) since 2018, we interrogate the extent to which VAWA, as currently implemented, fosters effective programs for sexual exploitation. We focus on VAWA because of its major impact on research and service priorities at the national, state, and local levels. Method: We contrast how VAWA funds are allocated, based on authorized mandates, with an examination of effectiveness within the sexual exploitation literature, using victim/survivors' own words to describe their needs. We analyze how VAWA's delivery model could be shifted within its historic framework to increase achievement of its intent. Results: VAWA emphasizes criminal justice-focused approaches that enable documented disappointing outcomes. Identified problems include misalignment of initiatives to goals, low funding of sexual exploitation, and failure to conduct program evaluation, each stifling innovative approaches. Conclusions: VAWA has not sufficiently changed in response to relevant policy analysis, empirical studies, or meta-analyses. We envision a better fit to purpose. The elevation of criminal justice over other interventions must be reduced. Community collaborations should be refocused on victim views of their justice and other recovery needs and on prevention. Policymakers should prioritize evidence-based and innovative solutions. Revising VAWA based on these principles at its 2027 reauthorization can increase likelihood of achieving stated goals. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved)

Remolding the court: The need for forward‐thinking evidentiary and sentencing practices in domestic violence cases with battered women

Prosecutors’ perceptions of how to improve the quality of evidence in domestic violence cases

When a Battered Victim Kills Their Abuser: The Impact of Child and Expert Testimony on Mock Jurors' Decision-Making

(In)credible Violence: An Analysis of Post-Alvarado Domestic Violence Asylum Cases in the United States

The Use of Battered Woman Syndrome in U.S. Criminal Courts

Battered Women Syndrome: A Headache for Medicine and Law

Judging Domestic Violence From the Bench: A Narrative Analysis of Judicial Anecdotes About Domestic Violence Protective Order Cases

Prosecutorial Decision Making in Domestic Violence Cases: Are Prosecutors Holding Offenders Accountable?

Specialised domestic violence courts in Canada and the United States: Key factors in prioritising safety for women and children

Obstacles to Victims’ Cooperation With the Criminal Prosecution of Their Abusers: The Role of Social Support

The Impact of Improving Access to Support Services for Victims of Domestic Violence on Demand for Services and Victim Outcomes

Counseling heterosexual women arrested for domestic violence: implications for theory and practice

Battered Women Syndrome: Need for Judicial Objectivity

Judicial Dilemmas of Female Domestic Violence Victims: An Empirical Study Based on Chinese Civil Judgments in 2020

Battered Woman Syndrome: Prospect of Situating It Within Criminal Law in India

Domestic Violence: The Psychological and Legal Factors That Affect Reporting, Prosecution, and Sentencing

Criminal Protection Orders: Implications of Requested Versus Issued Orders on Domestic Violence Revictimiztion and Mental Health Among Women

Credibility, Trauma, and the Law: Domestic Violence-Based Asylum Claims in the United States

Australia's Divergent Legal Responses to Women Who Kill Their Abusive Partners

Domestic violence and the criminal law

Using research to recalibrate the Violence Against Women Act initiatives for sexual exploitation response.