Improved performance of the opposing pulsed-jet cleaning by annular-slit nozzles for pleated filter cartridges

Zijie Lin,Jianlong Li,Da-Ren Chen,Quanquan Wu,Zhifei Ma,Daishe Wu

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seppur.2022.122233

IF: 8.6

2022-10-04

Separation and Purification Technology

Abstract:The opposing pulsed-jet cleaning with round nozzles has been recently introduced to reduce the patchy cleaning often faced during the regeneration of pleated filter cartridges in dust collectors. Additional to the primary nozzle for jetting a cleaning flow, the above technology applies an auxiliary nozzle installed at the cartridge base to launch a second flow for the cleaning. To further improve the performance, this study proposed to adopt an annular-slit nozzle as the primary-one in the above cleaning. The numerical modeling was applied to investigate the flow and pressure fields in a dust collector under the above cleaning with the settings varying the jet distance, h , from 0 to 700 mm, the delay time, Δt , from −0.125 to 0.125 s, and the pressure ratio, PR , from 0 to 4. The peak intensity and uniformity of the static pressure on the inner wall surfaces of filter cartridges during the cleaning were selected as the indicators for the cleaning performance. It is found that the cleaning performance in the cases with an annular-slit nozzle was found to be generally better than that in the cases with a round nozzle. Using an annular-slit nozzle, the air entrainment effect was enhanced, and the collision of both opposing jet flows was occurred in the position much closer to the cartridge opening. The cleaning in the case of Δt > 0 s was in general better than that in the cases of Δt < 0 s (with the optimum achieved at Δt = 0.025 s). The reasonable PR was in the range of 0.5 to 1.5 to realize effective jet airflow collision. The cleaning intensity and C.V. in the cases with an annular-slit nozzle and under the suggested settings of h = 300 mm, Δt = 0.025 s and PR = 1.5 would achieve the values of 1,050 Pa and 0.13 respectively, resulting in the 27 % and 63 % improvement on average (compared to those in the case using a round nozzle).

engineering, chemical