Abstract:Purpose This study examines whether auditors’ pricing decisions on managerial ability are affected by auditor litigation risk (financial distress or financial crisis), auditor’s familiarity with their client or regulatory changes in the post-Sarbanes–Oxley Act of 2002 (SOX) era. Design/methodology/approach Building on the extant audit fee literature, this study constructs an audit fee determinants model to examine how context affects auditors’ pricing of managerial ability. Findings Auditors offer a larger fee discount to more able client management teams when auditors face lower litigation risks or are more familiar with the client. Furthermore, managerial ability has a more pronounced effect on audit fees in the post-SOX era when managers are mandated to play more active roles in financial reporting (i.e. certification of financial statements required by SOX 302). Research limitations/implications Based on the audit risk model (Simunic, 1980), Krishnan and Wang (2015) show that the managerial ability of an audit client is relevant and important to auditors’ pricing decisions. This study demonstrates that managerial ability exhibits a non-linear relationship with audit fees and contextual factors, such as litigation risk, and that auditors’ familiarity with managers can alter the negative association between audit fees and managerial ability. This study extends Krishnan and Wang’s study by offering additional insights into auditors’ use of soft information such as managerial ability. Furthermore, the findings add to the literature on the impact of SOX on audit fees by suggesting that SOX has not only increased overall audit fees (Ghosh and Pawlewicz, 2009; Huang et al., 2009), it has also increased auditors’ price sensitivity to soft information (e.g. managerial ability). Practical implications This study provides insights for audit firms and client companies who are interested in understanding audit fee-pricing decisions. The findings also suggest that auditors need to be sensitive and responsive to various contextual factors when making pricing decisions. Originality/value Previous studies have not addressed the non-linear relationship between audit fees and soft information about managerial ability.

Analysis of the Sarbanes-Oxley Ban on Non-Audit Services From an Auction Model Perspective

Ex ante Uncertainty Risk,Governance Conflicts,and Auditor Choice:Empirical Evidence from China's IPO Market,1998—2004

Perceived Audit Quality, State Ownership, and Stock Price Delay: Evidence from China

The impact on the market for audit services of aggressive competition by auditors

Study on Initial Audit Pricing Discount of China's Public Companies:Evidence from Auditor Switch

Non�?Audit Fees and Auditor Independence: New Evidence Based on Going Concern Opinions for U.S. Companies Under Stress

Auctions Versus Posted-Price Selling

The effect of enforcement action on audit fees and the audit reporting lag

Rent-seeking Motivation and Auditing Market:Evidence from IPO Private Firms

Optimal procurement auctions with audit

Third-Party Consequences of Short-Selling Threats: the Case of Auditor Behavior

Do Non-audit Service Fees Impair Auditor Independence? Evidence from Going-concern Audit Opinions

Abnormal Audit Fees and Audit Quality, The Impact of Business Context on Auditors' Priorities

The Contextual Nature of the Association Between Managerial Ability and Audit Fees

AUDIT FEES LOW-BALLING , AND NON-AUDIT SERVICES : EVIDENCE FROM FIJI

Incentives for Auditor Independence: An Analysis of the Effectiveness of Formal Sanctions in China

The Effects of Clients' Controversial Activities on Audit Pricing

Does PCAOB inspection access improve audit quality? An examination of foreign firms listed in the United States

Competition and Sustainability: Evidence from Professional Service Organization

Overbidding in Mergers and Acquisitions: the Unintended Accounting Effect

The Impact of Ownership, Governance and Non-Audit Services on Audit Fees: Evidence from the Insurance Industry