Abstract:Introduction Ongoing changes in post resuscitation medicine and society create a range of ethical challenges for clinicians. Withdrawal of life-sustaining treatment is a very sensitive, complex decision to be made by the treatment team and the relatives together. According to the guidelines, prognostication after cardiopulmonary resuscitation should be based on a combination of clinical examination, biomarkers, imaging, and electrophysiological testing. Several prognostic scores exist to predict neurological and mortality outcome in post-cardiac arrest patients. We aimed to perform a meta-analysis and systematic review of current scoring systems used after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA). Materials and methods Our systematic search was conducted in four databases: Medline, Embase, Central and Scopus on 24th April 2023. The patient population consisted of successfully resuscitated adult patients after OHCA. We included all prognostic scoring systems in our analysis suitable to estimate neurologic function as the primary outcome and mortality as the secondary outcome. For each score and outcome, we collected the AUC (area under curve) values and their CIs (confidence iterval) and performed a random-effects meta-analysis to obtain pooled AUC estimates with 95% CI. To visualize the trade-off between sensitivity and specificity achieved using different thresholds, we created the Summary Receiver Operating Characteristic (SROC) curves. Results 24,479 records were identified, 51 of which met the selection criteria and were included in the qualitative analysis. Of these, 24 studies were included in the quantitative synthesis. The performance of CAHP (Cardiac Arrest Hospital Prognosis) (0.876 [0.853–0.898]) and OHCA (0.840 [0.824–0.856]) was good to predict neurological outcome at hospital discharge, and TTM (Targeted Temperature Management) (0.880 [0.844–0.916]), CAHP (0.843 [0.771–0.915]) and OHCA (0.811 [0.759–0.863]) scores predicted good the 6-month neurological outcome. We were able to confirm the superiority of the CAHP score especially in the high specificity range based on our sensitivity and specificity analysis. Conclusion Based on our results CAHP is the most accurate scoring system for predicting the neurological outcome at hospital discharge and is a bit less accurate than TTM score for the 6-month outcome. We recommend the use of the CAHP scoring system in everyday clinical practice not only because of its accuracy and the best performance concerning specificity but also because of the rapid and easy availability of the necessary clinical data for the calculation.

Comparison of different clinical risk scores to predict long-term survival and neurological outcome in adults after cardiac arrest: results from a prospective cohort study

Prediction performance of scoring systems after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest: A systematic review and meta-analysis

A Comparison of Prognostic Factors in a Large Cohort of In-Hospital and Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest Patients

Simultaneous prognostic score validation in patients with out-of-hospital cardiac arrest by a post-hoc analysis based on national multicenter registry

Comparison of Four Severity Assessment Scoring Systems in Critically Ill Patients for Predicting Patient Outcomes: A Prospective Observational Study From a Single Tertiary Center in Central India

Cardiac Arrest Survival Postresuscitation In-Hospital (CASPRI) Score Predicts Neurological Favorable Survival in Emergency Department Cardiac Arrest

Study of different score systems on predicting outcomes in severe patients of emergency departments

Post-ROsc ecG pREdictS Survival after out-of hospital cardiac arrest: validation of the PROGRESS score

Prediction of the neurological outcomes post-cardiac arrest: A prospective validation of the CAST and rCAST

Common intensive care scoring systems do not outperform age and glasgow coma scale score in predicting mid-term mortality in patients with spontaneous intracerebral hemorrhage treated in the intensive care unit

Standardised and automated assessment of head computed tomography reliably predicts poor functional outcome after cardiac arrest: a prospective multicentre study

Performance of the ERC/ESICM-recommendations for neuroprognostication after cardiac arrest: insights from a prospective multicenter cohort

External Validation and Comparison of Statistical and Machine Learning-Based Models in Predicting Outcomes Following Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest: A Multicenter Retrospective Analysis

The Modified Glasgow Outcome Score for the prediction of outcome in patients after cardiac arrest: a prospective clinical proof of concept study

Early risk stratification of patients after successfully resuscitated out-of-hospital cardiac arrest without ST-segment elevation - the TOMAHAWK risk score

Good outcome prediction after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest: A prospective multicenter observational study in Korea (the KORHN-PRO registry)

External validation of the rCAST for patients after in-hospital cardiac arrest: a multicenter retrospective observational study

External validation of risk scores for the outcome of COVID-19 on a 2-year Swiss cohort - A retrospective study

The simplified acute physiology score to predict outcome in patients with subarachnoid hemorrhage

Predicting survival and neurological outcome in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest using machine learning: the SCARS model

Predictors of survival and neurologic outcome for adults with extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation: A systemic review and meta-analysis.