Abstract:Abstract Cell signal networks are orchestrated directly or indirectly by various peptide-mediated protein–protein interactions, which are normally weak and transient and thus ideal for biological regulation and medicinal intervention. Here, we develop a general-purpose method for modeling and predicting the binding affinities of protein–peptide interactions (PpIs) at the structural level. The method is a hybrid strategy that employs an unsupervised approach to derive a layered PpI atom–residue interaction (ulPpI[a-r]) potential between different protein atom types and peptide residue types from thousands of solved PpI complex structures and then statistically correlates the potential descriptors with experimental affinities (KD values) over hundreds of known PpI samples in a supervised manner to create an integrated unsupervised–supervised PpI affinity (usPpIA) predictor. Although both the ulPpI[a-r] potential and usPpIA predictor can be used to calculate PpI affinities from their complex structures, the latter seems to perform much better than the former, suggesting that the unsupervised potential can be improved substantially with a further correction by supervised statistical learning. We examine the robustness and fault-tolerance of usPpIA predictor when applied to treat the coarse-grained PpI complex structures modeled computationally by sophisticated peptide docking and dynamics simulation. It is revealed that, despite developed solely based on solved structures, the integrated unsupervised–supervised method is also applicable for locally docked structures to reach a quantitative prediction but can only give a qualitative prediction on globally docked structures. The dynamics refinement seems not to change (or improve) the predictive results essentially, although it is computationally expensive and time-consuming relative to peptide docking. We also perform extrapolation of usPpIA predictor to the indirect affinity quantities of HLA-A*0201 binding epitope peptides and NHERF PDZ binding scaffold peptides, consequently resulting in a good and moderate correlation of the predicted KD with experimental IC50 and BLU on the two peptide sets, with Pearson’s correlation coefficients Rp = 0.635 and 0.406, respectively.

PLA-MoRe: A Protein-Ligand Binding Affinity Prediction Model via Comprehensive Molecular Representations

DLSSAffinity: Protein-Ligand Binding Affinity Prediction Via a Deep Learning Model

Improved prediction of ligand-protein binding affinities by meta-modeling

DL-SMILES#: A Novel Encoding Scheme for Predicting Compound Protein Affinity Using Deep Learning

Protein-ligand binding affinity prediction: Is 3D binding pose needed?

Binding Affinity Prediction: From Conventional to Machine Learning-Based Approaches

Structure-based, deep-learning models for protein-ligand binding affinity prediction

Does a More Precise Chemical Description of Protein–Ligand Complexes Lead to More Accurate Prediction of Binding Affinity?

Integrated unsupervised–supervised modeling and prediction of protein–peptide affinities at structural level

Prediction of protein–ligand binding affinity via deep learning models

Predicting drug-target binding affinity through molecule representation block based on multi-head attention and skip connection

Predicting Protein-Ligand Binding Affinity via Joint Global-Local Interaction Modeling

An updated dataset and a structure‐based prediction model for protein–RNA binding affinity

An Analysis of Proteochemometric and Conformal Prediction Machine Learning Protein-Ligand Binding Affinity Models

DeepRLI: A Multi-objective Framework for Universal Protein--Ligand Interaction Prediction

Synergistic Application of Molecular Docking and Machine Learning for Improved Binding Pose

Protein Language Model-Powered 3D Ligand Binding Site Prediction from Protein Sequence

Development of QSAR-Improved Statistical Potential for the Structure-Based Analysis of ProteinPeptide Binding Affinities

ERL‐ProLiGraph: Enhanced representation learning on protein‐ligand graph structured data for binding affinity prediction

On Machine Learning Approaches for Protein-Ligand Binding Affinity Prediction

Ensemble of local and global information for Protein-Ligand Binding Affinity Prediction