Abstract:BackgroundOne goal of structural biology is to understand how a protein’s 3-dimensional conformation determines its capacity to interact with potential ligands. In the case of small chemical ligands, deconstructing a static protein-ligand complex into its constituent atom-atom interactions is typically sufficient to rapidly predict ligand affinity with high accuracy (>70% correlation between predicted and experimentally-determined affinity), a fact that is exploited to support structure-based drug design. We recently found that protein-DNA/RNA affinity can also be predicted with high accuracy using extensions of existing techniques, but protein-protein affinity could not be predicted with >60% correlation, even when the protein-protein complex was available.MethodsX-ray and NMR structures of protein-protein complexes, their associated binding affinities and experimental conditions were obtained from different binding affinity and structural databases. Statistical models were implemented using a generalized linear model framework, including the experimental conditions as new model features. We evaluated the potential for new features to improve affinity prediction models by calculating the Pearson correlation between predicted and experimental binding affinities on the training and test data after model fitting and after cross-validation. Differences in accuracy were assessed using two-sample t test and nonparametric Mann–Whitney U test.ResultsHere we evaluate a range of potential factors that may interfere with accurate protein-protein affinity prediction. We find that X-ray crystal resolution has the strongest single effect on protein-protein affinity prediction. Limiting our analyses to only high-resolution complexes (≤2.5 Å) increased the correlation between predicted and experimental affinity from 54 to 68% (p = 4.32x10−3). In addition, incorporating information on the experimental conditions under which affinities were measured (pH, temperature and binding assay) had significant effects on prediction accuracy. We also highlight a number of potential errors in large structure-affinity databases, which could affect both model training and accuracy assessment.ConclusionsThe results suggest that the accuracy of statistical models for protein-protein affinity prediction may be limited by the information present in databases used to train new models. Improving our capacity to integrate large-scale structural and functional information may be required to substantively advance our understanding of the general principles by which a protein’s structure determines its function.

An updated dataset and a structure‐based prediction model for protein–RNA binding affinity

aPRBind: protein–RNA interface prediction by combining sequence and I-TASSER model-based structural features learned with convolutional neural networks

Prediction of RNA binding proteins comes of age from low resolution to high resolution.

emPDBA: protein-DNA binding affinity prediction by combining features from binding partners and interface learned with ensemble regression model

PredPRBA: Prediction of Protein-RNA Binding Affinity Using Gradient Boosted Regression Trees

Prediction of Protein-Rna Binding Sites by a Random Forest Method with Combined Features

Accurate prediction of RNA-binding protein residues with two discriminative structural descriptors

Computational Identification of Binding Energy Hot Spots in Protein-Rna Complexes Using an Ensemble Approach

A Knowledge-Based Scoring Function for Protein-Rna Interactions Derived from a Statistical Mechanics-Based Iterative Method

PRIME-3D2D is a 3D2D model to predict binding sites of protein–RNA interaction

PreDBA: A Heterogeneous Ensemble Approach for Predicting Protein-Dna Binding Affinity

RDense: A Protein-RNA Binding Prediction Model Based on Bidirectional Recurrent Neural Network and Densely Connected Convolutional Networks.

Highly accurate and high-resolution function prediction of RNA binding proteins by fold recognition and binding affinity prediction.

Improving the accuracy of high-throughput protein-protein affinity prediction may require better training data

PNAB: Prediction of Protein-Nucleic Acid Binding Affinity Using Heterogeneous Ensemble Models.

Structure-Based Prediction of Rna-Binding Domains and Rna-Binding Sites and Application to Structural Genomics Targets

An Effective Scoring Function with Atomic and Coarse-Grained Hybrid Representation for Protein-RNA Interactions

Structure-based prediction of protein–protein binding affinity with consideration of allosteric effect

Individually Double Minimum-Distance Definition of Protein–rna Binding Residues and Application to Structure-Based Prediction

Reliable method for predicting the binding affinity of RNA-small molecule interactions using machine learning

Prediction of Protein-Rna Interactions Using Sequence and Structure Descriptors