Abstract:Predicting accurate protein–ligand binding affinities is an important task in drug discovery but remains a challenge even with computationally expensive biophysics-based energy scoring methods and state-of-the-art deep learning approaches. Despite the recent advances in the application of deep convolutional and graph neural network-based approaches, it remains unclear what the relative advantages of each approach are and how they compare with physics-based methodologies that have found more mainstream success in virtual screening pipelines. We present fusion models that combine features and inference from complementary representations to improve binding affinity prediction. This, to our knowledge, is the first comprehensive study that uses a common series of evaluations to directly compare the performance of three-dimensional (3D)-convolutional neural networks (3D-CNNs), spatial graph neural networks (SG-CNNs), and their fusion. We use temporal and structure-based splits to assess performance on novel protein targets. To test the practical applicability of our models, we examine their performance in cases that assume that the crystal structure is not available. In these cases, binding free energies are predicted using docking pose coordinates as the inputs to each model. In addition, we compare these deep learning approaches to predictions based on docking scores and molecular mechanic/generalized Born surface area (MM/GBSA) calculations. Our results show that the fusion models make more accurate predictions than their constituent neural network models as well as docking scoring and MM/GBSA rescoring, with the benefit of greater computational efficiency than the MM/GBSA method. Finally, we provide the code to reproduce our results and the parameter files of the trained models used in this work. The software is available as open source at <a class="extLink" href="https://github.com/llnl/fast">https://github.com/llnl/fast</a>. Model parameter files are available at <a class="extLink" href="http://ftp://gdo-bioinformatics.ucllnl.org/fast/pdbbind2016_model_checkpoints/">ftp://gdo-bioinformatics.ucllnl.org/fast/pdbbind2016_model_checkpoints/</a>.This article has not yet been cited by other publications.

Protein-ligand binding affinity prediction: Is 3D binding pose needed?

DLSSAffinity: Protein-Ligand Binding Affinity Prediction Via a Deep Learning Model

Prediction of protein–ligand binding affinity via deep learning models

Improved Protein–Ligand Binding Affinity Prediction with Structure-Based Deep Fusion Inference

Structure-based, deep-learning models for protein-ligand binding affinity prediction

On Machine Learning Approaches for Protein-Ligand Binding Affinity Prediction

Binding Affinity Prediction with 3D Machine Learning: Training Data and Challenging External Testing

Binding Affinity Prediction: From Conventional to Machine Learning-Based Approaches

Synergistic Application of Molecular Docking and Machine Learning for Improved Binding Pose

Predicting the Protein-Ligand Affinity from Molecular Dynamics Trajectories

A Point Cloud-Based Deep Learning Strategy for Protein-Ligand Binding Affinity Prediction

Exploring protein–ligand binding affinity prediction with electron density-based geometric deep learning

DeepDTAF: a deep learning method to predict protein–ligand binding affinity

E3Bind: An End-to-End Equivariant Network for Protein-Ligand Docking

Deep Learning for Protein-Ligand Docking: Are We There Yet?

Harnessing Pre-trained Models for Accurate Prediction of Protein-Ligand Binding Affinity

DeepRLI: A Multi-objective Framework for Universal Protein--Ligand Interaction Prediction

DEELIG: A Deep Learning Approach to Predict Protein-Ligand Binding Affinity

DiffBindFR: An SE(3) Equivariant Network for Flexible Protein-Ligand Docking

DEAttentionDTA: protein–ligand binding affinity prediction based on dynamic embedding and self-attention