Abstract:BackgroundThe terms “femoral anteversion” and “femoral torsion” have often been used interchangeably in the orthopaedic literature, yet they represent distinct anatomical entities. Anteversion refers to anterior tilt of the femoral neck, whereas torsion describes rotation of the femoral shaft. Together, these and other transverse plane differences describe what may be considered rotational deformities of the femur. Assessment of femoral rotation is now routinely measured by multiple axial CT methods. The most widely used radiographic technique (in which only two CT-derived axes are made, one through the femoral neck and one at the distal femoral condyles) may not accurately quantify proximal femoral anatomy nor allow identification of the anatomic locus of rotation.Questions/purposes(1) What CT methodology (a two-axis CT-derived technique, a three-axis technique adding an intertrochanteric axis—the “Kim method,” or a volumetric three-dimensional reconstruction of the proximal femur) most accurately quantifies transverse plane femoral morphology; (2) localizes those deformities; and (3) is most reproducible across different observers?MethodsWe constructed a high-definition femoral sawbones model in which osteotomies were performed at either the intertrochanteric region or femoral shaft. Transverse plane deformity was randomly introduced and CT-derived rotational profiles were constructed using three different CT methods. Accuracy and consistency of measurements of femoral rotation were calculated using p values and Fisher’s exact test and intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs).ResultsAll three CT methodologies accurately quantified overall transverse plane rotation (mean differences 0.69° ± 3.88°, 0.69° ± 3.88°, and −1.09° ± 4.44° for the two-plane, Kim, and volumetric methods, respectively). However, use of a single neck and single distal femoral axis does not reliably identify the anatomic locus of rotation, whereas the Kim and volumetric methods do (p < 0.0001). All three methods were highly reproducible between observers (ICCs of 0.9569, 0.9569, and 0.9359 for the traditional two-plane, Kim, and volumetric methods, respectively).ConclusionsOnly the Kim and volumetric methods can identify the anatomic location of transverse plane rotation and we recommend using one of the two techniques. Accurate anatomic localization of transverse plane rotation enables using precise anatomic terminology (“femoral torsion” versus “femoral [ante]version”).Clinical RelevanceCurrent descriptions and treatment of femoral rotational deformities do not discriminate the location of rotation. The transverse plane femoral rotation requires a precise definition based on its anatomic location to maintain consistent communication between clinicians, because version of the neck and torsion of the shaft may have different treatment.

Femoral anteversion measured by the surgical transepicondylar axis is a reliable parameter for evaluating femoral rotational deformities in patients with patellar dislocation

Femoral anteversion angle is more advantageous than TT‐TG distance in evaluating patellar dislocation: A retrospective cohort study

Decreased femoral trochlea axial orientation corrected by derotational distal femur osteotomy in patients with patellar dislocation yields satisfactory outcomes

Clinical outcomes of derotational femoral osteotomy combined with medial patellofemoral ligament reconstruction in patients with patellar dislocation and increased femoral anteversion unaffected by the pattern of distribution of femoral torsion

High femoral anteversion in osteoarthritic knees, particularly for severe valgus deformity

Computer-aided design combined with 3D-printed osteotomy guide-assisted derotational distal femoral osteotomy for treating recurrent patellar dislocation with increased femoral anteversion angle: a retrospective study

The femoral anterior tangent line could serve as a reliable alternative reference axis for distal femoral rotational alignment in total knee arthroplasty: an MRI-based study

Measurement of femoral posterior condylar offset and posterior tibial slope in normal knees based on 3D reconstruction

Abnormal Femur Rotation in Patients with Recurrent Patellar Dislocation: A Study on Upright Standing Three-Dimensionally Reconstructed EOS Images.

Surgical Transepicondylar Axis is Not a Reliable Reference when There Was Lateral Femoral Bowing

Intraoperative estimation of natural femoral anteversion from proximal femoral osseous orientation during total hip arthroplasty

Derotational distal femoral osteotomy corrects excessive femoral anteversion in patients with patellofemoral instability: A systematic review

Femoral version and its clinical relevance in adult hip preservation surgery for developmental dysplasia of the hip

Femoral Anteversion Angle as a Predictor of Anterior Hip Labral Length in Patients With Femoroacetabular Impingement Syndrome

Effect of femoral derotational osteotomy in patients with idiopathic increased femoral anteversion on joint loading and muscular demands

Functional knee joint axis calibration and outcome after femoral derotation in patients with cerebral palsy

The Effect of the Morphology of the Femur and Acetabulum in Dysplastic Hips on the Selection of Arthroplasty Femoral Implants: A Computer Tomography‐Based Study

Decision Making and Management of Anterior Knee Pain in Young Patients With Pathological Femoral Anteversion: A Critical Analysis Review

Can Femoral Rotation Be Localized and Quantified Using Standard CT Measures?

A New Method to Predict Postoperative Stem Anteversion in Total Hip Arthroplasty for Developmental Dysplasia of the Hip

Comparison of fluoroscopic techniques for assessment of femoral rotational alignment