Medial Trochlea Superior Surface—a New Bony Landmark to Assist the Femoral Rotational Alignment in the Total Knee Arthroplasty
Yuan Liu,Jun Ma,Limin Wu,Xianchao Bao,Jing Yang,Bin Shen
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/cm9.0000000000002401
2022-01-01
Abstract:To the Editor: Femoral rotational alignment not only affects patellar tracking and alters peak contact forces, but also determines the flexion gap of the components.[1] If the angle of the external rotation is too large, it would lead to medial compartment loosing during knee flexion; if the angle is too small, it would lead to a narrowing medial compartment. A series of studies have found that the malalignment of femoral prosthesis resulted in poor outcomes after total knee arthroplasty (TKA), such as the lower Knee Society Scores, flexion instability, premature wear of the polyethylene, premature loosening of component and ongoing knee pain. It is helpful to introduce a new bony landmark to assist the femoral rotational alignment, and decrease the adverse effects caused by poor alignment of femoral rotation in TKA. The surface upon the medial trochlea, which was named as medial trochlea superior surface (MTSS) in this research, was found possibly parallel to the surgical trans-epicondylar axis (sTEA), which was usually used as a referential axis for femoral rotational alignment in TKA. Hence, MTSS might be used as a referential surface in TKA for its special anatomical position. The medial boundary of MTSS is close to the axis of the femoral shaft, and the distal end is immediately adjacent to the upper edge of the medial trochlea. The specific location of MTSS in TKA is shown in Figure 1A.Figure 1: Location of MTSS during knee replacement and the measurement of angles formed between candidate axes and sTEA. (A) The specific location of MTSS in total knee arthroplasty. (B) The specific location of the MTA, aTEA, PCA, and sTEA in contiguous two-dimensional CT slices. (C) The example of angle measurement between MTA and sTEA in two-dimensional CT slices. (D) The example of angle measurement between aTEA and sTEA in two-dimensional CT slices. (E) The example of angle measurement between PCA and sTEA in two-dimensional CT slices. aTEA: Anatomical trans-epicondylar axis; CT: Computed tomography; MTA: Medial trochlea axis; MTSS: Medial trochlea superior surface; PCA: Posterior condylar axis; sTEA: Surgical trans-epicondylar axis.This study was approved by the Ethics Review Board of West China Hospital, Sichuan University (No. 2020631). Written informed consent was obtained from all subjects. The positional relationship between MTSS and sTEA was measured and determined in both patients and health controls to assess the value of MTSS as a new bony landmark in TKA. A total of 46 patients with 64 knees waiting for TKA and 67 controls with 111 knees from the Physical Examination Center, West China Hospital, Sichuan University were included in this study, and all subjects received computed tomography (CT) examination (Siemens Healthineers, Forchheim, Germany) to determine the location of MTSS in femoral rotational alignment. Participants lied in supine position and kept the legs straight during CT scanning. And any knee varus or valgus deviations of all participants were corrected during CT positioning. Multi-slice CT scans with a 1.0 mm slice thickness were obtained. To confirm the value of MTSS in helping femoral rotational alignment in TKA, other common axes including anatomical trans-epicondylar axis (aTEA), posterior condylar axis (PCA) and PCA (external rotation + 3° [ER+3°]) were also measured and compared with the medial trochlea axis (MTA), which corresponds to the MTSS in knee joint. The specific locations of MTA, aTEA, PCA and sTEA in contiguous two-dimensional CT slices are shown in Figure 1B. The specific descriptions are as follows: (1) MTA is the tangent line of MTSS; (2) aTEA is the connecting line between the lateral and medial epicondylar prominence; (3) PCA is tangent to the posterior surface of the two epicondyles of the femur; and (4) sTEA connects the lateral epicondylar prominence and the medial sulcus in the posterior surface of the medial epicondyle. The angles formed between sTEA and all candidate structures were measured, and the example of measurement is shown in Figures 1C–1E. Shapiro–Wilk test was used for the normal distribution test of continuous variables. And the box diagram and scatter diagram were used to present the degree of variation in angles formed between sTEA and candidate structures. All data analysis was performed using SPSS version 24.0 software (IBM Corp, Armonk, NY, USA). The angle formed between MTA and sTEA was the smallest in both patient (+0.1°, [0.0°, +0.2°], “+” represents external rotation with respect to the sTEA) and control groups (0.0°, [0.0°, 0.0°]). In both patient and control groups, the PCA formed the largest angle with the sTEA in all candidate structures (patient: −3.6° [−5.2°, −2.3°]; control: −3.5° [−4.6°, −2.4°]; “−” represents internal rotation with respect to the sTEA). The angle formed between aTEA and sTEA was +3.2° (+2.7°, +3.7°) in patient group and +3.3° (+3.0°, +3.8°) in control group. The angle formed between the PCA (ER+3°) and sTEA was close to but greater than the angle formed by MTA and sTEA, which was −0.6 (−2.2°, +0.7°) in patient group and −0.5° (−1.6°, +0.6°) in control group. And the box diagram and scatter diagram showed that MTA was not only almost parallel to the sTEA, but also the degree of variation in the angles formed between MTA and sTEA was the smallest compared to those between other candidate axes and sTEA [Supplementary Figures 1 and 2, https://links.lww.com/CM9/B195]. This study proposed the MTSS as a new and assistant bony landmark to improve the accuracy of femoral rotational alignment in TKA. Femoral rotational alignment is important for avoiding the postoperative complications and maximizing the preservation of knee function after TKA. Jones et al[2] had analysed magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scans from patients who underwent TKA, and concluded that the individual variations in external rotation of PCA may be a contributing factor in implant malalignment and patient dissatisfaction. Talbot et al[3] had measured the relative rotation between bony landmarks by computer navigation and proposed that the anterior surface of the femur proximal to the trochlea could be used as a landmark for rotational alignment. However, they did not provide any intraoperative images to determine the specific location of the proposed surface. In this study, we provided the specific location of MTSS in TKA. Watanabe et al[4] introduced a line, which is tangent to the anterior surface of the femur and immediately proximal to the trochlea, as an alternative rotational landmark. However, the tangent line of the entire anterior surface of femur was difficult to define and popularize for the subjective bias. What's more, Won et al[5] proposed the anterior trochlear line, which is the connecting line between the most anterior projections of the lateral and medial femoral condyles, as another reference axis for femoral rotational alignment. However, it was also limited by the destruction of the femoral condylar surface, trochlear wear or intercondylar osteophytes. In our study, the stable parallel relationship between sTEA and MTSS of femur was found. Compared with line, MTSS is not susceptible to subjective bias, and easier to define. Besides, the advantage of MTSS also included that it could be easily determined during TKA and was not limited by the destruction of osteoarthritic knees. Additionally, a plane, which was defined by any three points of MTSS, can be used to determine the orientation of femoral prosthesis and to guide the femoral rotational osteotomy during TKA. In particular, MTSS can be used in cases who have a history of unicompartmental knee arthroplasty failure or complicated TKA. However, there were several limitations in our study. Firstly, MTSS was just proposed, the objective methodology and matched equipment for its application during TKA remain under investigation and preparation. Secondly, subgroup analysis based on the type of disease or preoperative coronal alignment was not performed in this study, which might increase the risk of bias. Finally, it's important to note that a single referential structure is difficult to precisely determine the rotation due to anatomical variations and poor visibility. Therefore, MTSS was proposed as an auxiliary landmark for the femoral rotational alignment in TKA, but it could not replace the previous reference axes. In conclusion, though there are various landmarks and reference axes for the femoral rotational alignment, they are still insufficient due to the anatomical variations and poor vision during TKA. Additionally, the bone defect at revision surgery further hinders the determination of the femoral rotational alignment. According to this research, MTSS may be an auxiliary landmark to determine the femoral rotational alignment during TKA. Funding This study was supported by grants from the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 81974347), National Clinical Research Center for Geriatrics, West China Hospital Sichuan University (No. Z2021JC002). Conflicts of interest None.