Countering Algorithmic Bias and Disinformation and Effectively Harnessing the Power of AI in Media

Donghee Shin,Michael Hameleers,Yong Jin Park,Jeong Nam Kim,Daniel Trielli,Nicholas Diakopoulos,Natali Helberger,Seth C. Lewis,Oscar Westlund,Sabine Baumann

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/10776990221129245

2022-11-19

Abstract:Journalism &Mass Communication Quarterly, Volume 99, Issue 4, Page 887-907, December 2022.

communication

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

Justice in Misinformation Detection Systems: An Analysis of Algorithms, Stakeholders, and Potential Harms

Terrence Neumann,Maria De-Arteaga,Sina Fazelpour

DOI: https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2204.13568

2022-04-28

Computers and Society

Abstract:Faced with the scale and surge of misinformation on social media, many platforms and fact-checking organizations have turned to algorithms for automating key parts of misinformation detection pipelines. While offering a promising solution to the challenge of scale, the ethical and societal risks associated with algorithmic misinformation detection are not well-understood. In this paper, we employ and extend upon the notion of informational justice to develop a framework for explicating issues of justice relating to representation, participation, distribution of benefits and burdens, and credibility in the misinformation detection pipeline. Drawing on the framework: (1) we show how injustices materialize for stakeholders across three algorithmic stages in the pipeline; (2) we suggest empirical measures for assessing these injustices; and (3) we identify potential sources of these harms. This framework should help researchers, policymakers, and practitioners reason about potential harms or risks associated with these algorithms and provide conceptual guidance for the design of algorithmic fairness audits in this domain.
Smart Media or Biased Media: The Impacts and Challenges of AI and Big Data on the Media Industry

Amaka Debie Samuel-Okon

DOI: https://doi.org/10.9734/ajrcos/2024/v17i7484

2024-07-06

Asian Journal of Research in Computer Science

Abstract:This study critically analyzes the impact of artificial intelligence (AI) and big data on the media industry, focusing on the ethical challenges and biases introduced by these technologies. The research aims to uncover the extent to which AI and big data influence content personalization, creation, and marketing, and the ramifications of these influences on cultural diversity and societal norms. A mixed-methods approach was employed, combining quantitative analysis through a survey of 532 respondents and qualitative thematic analysis of 10 academic literatures. The findings reveal significant associations between automated content creation tools and societal biases, personalized recommendation systems and echo chambers, and algorithmic recommendations and cultural homogenization. Conversely, no significant association was found between big data analytics and privacy concerns. The study highlights the need for ethical guidelines, enhanced content diversity, strengthened data privacy measures, and increased algorithmic transparency to mitigate the ethical challenges and biases in AI-driven media platforms. These insights contribute to the broader understanding of AI and big data's role in shaping the media industry, offering valuable implications for future research, policy-making, and industry practices.
Can an Algorithm Reduce the Perceived Bias of News? Testing the Effect of Machine Attribution on News Readers’ Evaluations of Bias, Anthropomorphism, and Credibility

T. Franklin Waddell

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1077699018815891

2019-01-25

Abstract:Although accusations of editorial slant are ubiquitous to the contemporary media environment, recent advances in journalism such as news writing algorithms may hold the potential to reduce readers’ perceptions of media bias. Informed by the Modality-Agency-Interactivity-Navigability (MAIN) model and the principle of similarity attraction, an online experiment ( n = 612) was conducted to test if news attributed to an automated author is perceived as less biased and more credible than news attributed to a human author. Results reveal that perceptions of bias are attenuated when news is attributed to a journalist and algorithm in tandem, with positive downstream consequences for perceived news credibility.

communication
Counterspeakers' Perspectives: Unveiling Barriers and AI Needs in the Fight against Online Hate

Jimin Mun,Cathy Buerger,Jenny T. Liang,Joshua Garland,Maarten Sap

2024-03-01

Abstract:Counterspeech, i.e., direct responses against hate speech, has become an important tool to address the increasing amount of hate online while avoiding censorship. Although AI has been proposed to help scale up counterspeech efforts, this raises questions of how exactly AI could assist in this process, since counterspeech is a deeply empathetic and agentic process for those involved. In this work, we aim to answer this question, by conducting in-depth interviews with 10 extensively experienced counterspeakers and a large scale public survey with 342 everyday social media users. In participant responses, we identified four main types of barriers and AI needs related to resources, training, impact, and personal harms. However, our results also revealed overarching concerns of authenticity, agency, and functionality in using AI tools for counterspeech. To conclude, we discuss considerations for designing AI assistants that lower counterspeaking barriers without jeopardizing its meaning and purpose.

Human-Computer Interaction
The Ethical Revolution: Challenges and Reflections in the Face of the Integration of Artificial Intelligence in Digital Journalism

Tania Forja-Pena,Berta García-Orosa,Xosé López-García

DOI: https://doi.org/10.15581/003.37.3.237-254

2024-06-27

Communication & Society

Abstract:The artificial intelligence (AI) tools in editorial departments have become common practice within news organisations, which poses challenges for digital journalism. It treads new terrain for both media professionals and their audiences, and it is safe to assume there is no going back to the way things were. These advances in the field require new frameworks and codes of ethics that include ethical principles to mitigate the use of AI in journalism. The fast incorporation of AI into media production processes is marked by a tendency towards the loss of citizens’ trust in the information that media offers, political polarization, and the increasing impact of misinformation. This article analyses the perception of communication professionals in this new scene through the analysis of 99 codes of ethics and 14 international press associations. In addition, audience perception is addressed through a survey taken by nearly 2,000 people. The results indicate that both the public and journalists are worried about misinformation that AI might cause and the potential erosion of trust between journalist and the public . Overwhelmingly, people are advocating for external regulation of its use to preserve the values, the ethical principles, and good practices of journalistic work.
Combating Misinformation and Polarization in the Corporate Sphere: Integrating Social, Technological and AI Strategies

Alberto Tejero,,Galena Pisoni,Ziba Habibi Lashkari,Sergio Rios-Aguilar,,,

DOI: https://doi.org/10.9781/ijimai.2024.03.003

IF: 4.936

2024-01-01

International Journal of Interactive Multimedia and Artificial Intelligence

Abstract:In an era where misinformation and polarization present significant challenges, this research examines the root causes within social networks and assesses how corporations can use AI technologies for prompt detection. This research uses a dual approach: a "telephone game" with 225 participants from a Spanish university to study the spread of misinformation, and interviews with 15 experts from three French tech companies to investigate technological solutions. The findings indicate that almost one-third of participants inadvertently contribute to polarization, and around one-quarter propagated misinformation. The study also identifies the existing tools enhanced by AI and Machine Learning that effectively detect misinformation and polarization in corporate settings. This investigation provides crucial insights for practitioners to strengthen their strategies against misinformation and technical challenges and opportunities.

computer science, artificial intelligence, interdisciplinary applications
Behind the black box: The moderating role of the machine heuristic on the effect of transparency information about automated journalism on hostile media bias perception

Rui Wang,Yotam Ophir

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/14648849241284575

IF: 3.1941

2024-09-15

Journalism

Abstract:Journalism, Ahead of Print. Facing historically low levels of public trust, journalists had been increasingly interested in the potential of artificial intelligence to produce news content. Some have suggested that Automated Journalism (AJ) may reduce Hostile Media Biases (HMB), where partisans perceive balanced articles as slanted against their side. However, empirical evidence for the hypothesis remains limited and inconclusive. In this study, we examine whether the effectiveness of AJ at reducing HMB perceptions could be enhanced by disclosure of transparency information about how the algorithm works. We conducted an online experiment (N = 264 US adults) in which participants were randomly assigned to read a balanced news article about gun control written by different authors (AJ, AJ + transparency information, journalist, student, no author). Our findings indicate that AJ transparency, on average, did not significantly reduce HMB compared to AJ along. A significant interaction effect was identified: participants who strongly endorsed the machine heuristic were less likely to perceive the content in the AJ transparency condition, but not that of other conditions, as biased. Theoretical and practical implications are discussed.

communication
Removing AI’s Sentiment Manipulation of Personalized News Delivery

Chuhan Wu,Fangzhao Wu,Tao Qi,Wei-Qiang Zhang,Xing Xie,Yongfeng Huang

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-022-01473-1

2022-01-01

Humanities and Social Sciences Communications

Abstract:Artificial intelligence (AI) is empowering personalized online news delivery to accommodate people’s information needs and combat information overload. However, AI models learned from user data are inheriting and amplifying some underlying human prejudice such as the sentiment bias of news reading, which may lead to potential negative societal effects and ethical concerns. Here, substantial evidence shows that AI is manipulating the sentiment orientation of news displayed to users by promoting the presence chance of negative news, even if there is no human interference. To mitigate this manipulation, a sentiment-debiasing method based on a decomposed adversarial learning framework is proposed, which can reduce 97.3% of sentiment bias with only 2.9% accuracy sacrifice. Our work provides the potential in improving AI’s responsibility in many human-centered applications such as online journalism and information spread.
Artificial Intelligence in Automated Detection of Disinformation: A Thematic Analysis

Fátima C. Carrilho Santos

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/journalmedia4020043

2023-06-03

Journalism and Media

Abstract:The increasing prevalence of disinformation has led to a growing interest in leveraging artificial intelligence (AI) for detecting and combating this phenomenon. This article presents a thematic analysis of the potential benefits of automated disinformation detection from the perspective of information sciences. The analysis covers a range of approaches, including fact checking, linguistic analysis, sentiment analysis, and the utilization of human-in-the-loop systems. Furthermore, the article explores how the combination of blockchain and AI technologies can be used to automate the process of disinformation detection. Ultimately, the article aims to consider the integration of AI into journalism and emphasizes the importance of ongoing collaboration between these fields to effectively combat the spread of disinformation. The article also addresses ethical considerations related to the use of AI in journalism, including concerns about privacy, transparency, and accountability.
Addressing the Impact of Artificial Intelligence on Journalism: the perception of experts, journalists and academics

Amaya Noain-Sánchez

DOI: https://doi.org/10.15581/003.35.3.105-121

2022-06-07

Communication & Society

Abstract:Over the last decade, Artificial Intelligence (AI) has become gradually more prevalent in mass media and news agency newsrooms. This growing tendency has prompted intense debate about the negative impact on journalism, particularly on quality standards and ethical principles. Taking an explorative approach, this study aims to analyse the application of AI in newsrooms, focusing on the impact on news-making processes, media routines and profiles, highlighting the benefits and shortcomings, and finally, analysing the rise of ethical dilemmas. For this purpose, 15 in-depth interviews were conducted in two rounds, in 2019 and 2021, with a sample of journalists and other media professionals, academics, experts on the media industry, and providers of technology leading the work on AI. The international sample includes interviewees from the United States, the United Kingdom, Germany and Spain. The interviewees agree that AI will enhance journalists’ capabilities by saving time, augmenting the efficiency of the news-making processes and, therefore, increasing mass media industry productivity. However, a change of mind-set in the media environment is needed, and training on the use of these tools must be a priority given the lack of knowledge observed. Finally, the emergence of ethical issues underlines the need for continuous control and supervision of the processes undertaken by AI.
Rating Reliability and Bias in News Articles: Does AI Assistance Help Everyone?

Benjamin D. Horne,Dorit Nevo,John O'Donovan,Jin-Hee Cho,Sibel Adali

DOI: https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1904.01531

2019-04-02

Computers and Society

Abstract:With the spread of false and misleading information in current news, many algorithmic tools have been introduced with the aim of assessing bias and reliability in written content. However, there has been little work exploring how effective these tools are at changing human perceptions of content. To this end, we conduct a study with 654 participants to understand if algorithmic assistance improves the accuracy of reliability and bias perceptions, and whether there is a difference in the effectiveness of the AI assistance for different types of news consumers. We find that AI assistance with feature-based explanations improves the accuracy of news perceptions. However, some consumers are helped more than others. Specifically, we find that participants who read and share news often on social media are worse at recognizing bias and reliability issues in news articles than those who do not, while frequent news readers and those familiar with politics perform much better. We discuss these differences and their implication to offer insights for future research.
Automated news recommendation in front of adversarial examples and the technical limits of transparency in algorithmic accountability

Antonin Descampe,Clément Massart,Simon Poelman,François-Xavier Standaert,Olivier Standaert

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00146-021-01159-3

2021-03-13

Abstract:Algorithmic decision making is used in an increasing number of fields. Letting automated processes take decisions raises the question of their accountability. In the field of computational journalism, the algorithmic accountability framework proposed by Diakopoulos formalizes this challenge by considering algorithms as objects of human creation, with the goal of revealing the intent embedded into their implementation. A consequence of this definition is that ensuring accountability essentially boils down to a transparency question: given the appropriate reverse-engineering tools, it should be feasible to extract design criteria and to identify intentional biases. General limitations of this transparency ideal have been discussed by Ananny and Crawford (New Media Soc 20(3):973–989, 2018). We further focus on its technical limitations. We show that even if reverse-engineering concludes that the criteria embedded into an algorithm correspond to its publicized intent, it may be that adversarial behaviors make the algorithm deviate from its expected operation. We illustrate this issue with an automated news recommendation system, and show how the classification algorithms used in such systems can be fooled with hard-to-notice modifications of the articles to classify. We therefore suggest that robustness against adversarial behaviors should be taken into account in the definition of algorithmic accountability, to better capture the risks inherent to algorithmic decision making. We finally discuss the various challenges that this new technical limitation raises for journalism practice.
Dilemma and coping strategies of news communication based on artificial intelligence and big data

Wen Zhou

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e25398

IF: 3.776

2024-02-01

Heliyon

Abstract:News dissemination is an important way for people to obtain information. With the development of new technologies, traditional news dissemination models have been impacted. It has problems with information filtering and bias, and has certain limitations in news quality, dissemination efficiency, etc., which makes it difficult to effectively meet people's information needs. In order to improve the quality and efficiency of news dissemination, promote the positive impact of news dissemination on society, this article combined artificial intelligence and big data technology to conduct in-depth research on the difficulties and coping strategies of news dissemination. This article first analyzed the characteristics and functions and influencing factors of news dissemination, then provided an overview of the difficulties and coping strategies in news dissemination. Finally, using association rule algorithms, personalized recommendations for news dissemination are achieved. To verify the effectiveness of artificial intelligence and big data in coping with the dilemma of news dissemination, this article conducted experimental analysis from the perspectives of news content quality, dissemination efficiency, objectivity, and dissemination cost. The experimental results show that under the application of news dissemination strategies based on artificial intelligence and big data, the quality of news content and dissemination efficiency have been improved by 4.76 % and 3.63 %, respectively. The conclusion indicates that artificial intelligence and big data can help improve the quality and dissemination efficiency of news content, and meet the diverse needs of the public for information.
Impact of Artificial Intelligence News Source Credibility Identification System on Effectiveness of Media Literacy Education

Tosti H. C. Chiang,Chih-Shan Liao,Wei-Ching Wang

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su14084830

IF: 3.9

2022-04-18

Sustainability

Abstract:During presidential elections and showbusiness or social news events, society has begun to address the risk of fake news. The Sustainable Development Goals 4 for Global Education Agenda aims to “ensure inclusive and equitable quality education and promote lifelong learning opportunities for all” by 2030. As a result, various nations have deemed media literacy education a required competence in order for audiences to maintain a discerning attitude and to verify messages rather than automatically believing them. This study developed a highly efficient message discrimination method using new technology using artificial intelligence and big data information processing containing general news and content farm message data on approximately 938,000 articles. Deep neural network technology was used to create a news source credibility identification system. Media literacy was the core of the experimental course design. Two groups of participants used different methods to perform message discrimination. The results revealed that the system significantly expanded the participants’ knowledge of media literacy. The system positively affected the participants’ attitude, confidence, and motivation towards media literacy learning. This research provides a method of identifying fake news in order to ensure that audiences are not affected by fake messages, thereby helping to maintain a democratic society.

environmental sciences,environmental studies,green & sustainable science & technology
The Effects of AI-based Credibility Indicators on the Detection and Spread of Misinformation under Social Influence

Zhuoran Lu,Patrick Li,Weilong Wang,Ming Yin

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/3555562

2022-11-07

Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction

Abstract:Misinformation on social media has become a serious concern. Marking news stories with credibility indicators, possibly generated by an AI model, is one way to help people combat misinformation. In this paper, we report the results of two randomized experiments that aim to understand the effects of AI-based credibility indicators on people's perceptions of and engagement with the news, when people are under social influence such that their judgement of the news is influenced by other people. We find that the presence of AI-based credibility indicators nudges people into aligning their belief in the veracity of news with the AI model's prediction regardless of its correctness, thereby changing people's accuracy in detecting misinformation. However, AI-based credibility indicators show limited impacts on influencing people's engagement with either real news or fake news when social influence exists. Finally, it is shown that when social influence is present, the effects of AI-based credibility indicators on the detection and spread of misinformation are larger as compared to when social influence is absent, when these indicators are provided to people before they form their own judgements about the news. We conclude by providing implications for better utilizing AI to fight misinformation.
The E�ects of AI-based Credibility Indicators on the Detection and Spread of Misinformation under Social Influence

Weilong Wang,L. Patrick,Ming Yin,Zhuoran Lu

Abstract:Misinformation on social media has become a serious concern. Marking news stories with credibility indicators, possibly generated by an AI model, is one way to help people combat misinformation. In this paper, we report the results of two randomized experiments that aim to understand the e�ects of AI-based credibility indicators on people’s perceptions of and engagement with the news, when people are under social in�uence such that their judgement of the news is in�uenced by other people. We �nd that the presence of AI-based credibility indicators nudges people into aligning their belief in the veracity of news with the AI model’s prediction regardless of its correctness, thereby changing people’s accuracy in detecting misinformation. However, AI-based credibility indicators show limited impacts on in�uencing people’s engagement with either real news or fake news when social in�uence exists. Finally, it is shown that when social in�uence is present, the e�ects of AI-based credibility indicators on the detection and spread of misinformation are larger as compared to when social in�uence is absent, when these indicators are provided to people before they form their own judgements about the news. We conclude by providing implications for better utilizing AI to �ght misinformation.

Computer Science
Mitigating Biases in Collective Decision-Making: Enhancing Performance in the Face of Fake News

Axel Abels,Elias Fernandez Domingos,Ann Nowé,Tom Lenaerts

2024-03-11

Abstract:Individual and social biases undermine the effectiveness of human advisers by inducing judgment errors which can disadvantage protected groups. In this paper, we study the influence these biases can have in the pervasive problem of fake news by evaluating human participants' capacity to identify false headlines. By focusing on headlines involving sensitive characteristics, we gather a comprehensive dataset to explore how human responses are shaped by their biases. Our analysis reveals recurring individual biases and their permeation into collective decisions. We show that demographic factors, headline categories, and the manner in which information is presented significantly influence errors in human judgment. We then use our collected data as a benchmark problem on which we evaluate the efficacy of adaptive aggregation algorithms. In addition to their improved accuracy, our results highlight the interactions between the emergence of collective intelligence and the mitigation of participant biases.

Human-Computer Interaction,Machine Learning,Social and Information Networks
Combating Misinformation and Fake News: The Potential of AI and Media Literacy Education

Jerry Washington

DOI: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4580385

2023-01-01

SSRN Electronic Journal

Abstract:The rapid proliferation of misinformation, disinformation, and fake news in the digital age poses a significant threat to society. As these phenomena spread across various media platforms, their impact on public discourse, political decisions, and social cohesion becomes more evident. Combining AI with media literacy education and practice has emerged as a potential solution to mitigate the influence of false information on society. This critical literary review delves into the nature of misinformation, disinformation, and fake news, explores the significance of media literacy education and practice, examines the development of Generative AI, and investigates the ethical implications of processing information. The review presents findings highlighting the potential of AI and media literacy education to combat misinformation and fake news effectively. It also discusses the ethical concerns surrounding AI technology and its impact on information dissemination. This review emphasizes the importance of incorporating media literacy education into the digital citizenship curriculum and calls for an interdisciplinary approach involving educators, policymakers, and technologists to foster a resilient and informed society.
The Dual Nature of AI in Information Dissemination: Ethical Considerations

Federico Germani,Giovanni Spitale,Nikola Biller-Andorno

DOI: https://doi.org/10.2196/53505

2024-10-15

Abstract:Infodemics pose significant dangers to public health and to the societal fabric, as the spread of misinformation can have far-reaching consequences. While artificial intelligence (AI) systems have the potential to craft compelling and valuable information campaigns with positive repercussions for public health and democracy, concerns have arisen regarding the potential use of AI systems to generate convincing disinformation. The consequences of this dual nature of AI, capable of both illuminating and obscuring the information landscape, are complex and multifaceted. We contend that the rapid integration of AI into society demands a comprehensive understanding of its ethical implications and the development of strategies to harness its potential for the greater good while mitigating harm. Thus, in this paper we explore the ethical dimensions of AI's role in information dissemination and impact on public health, arguing that potential strategies to deal with AI and disinformation encompass generating regulated and transparent data sets used to train AI models, regulating content outputs, and promoting information literacy.
Artificial Intelligence for Media: Opportunities or Threats

Prashant Kumar,Bhaskar Singh

DOI: https://doi.org/10.58966/jcm2024323

2024-06-20

Abstract:The emergence of artificial intelligence (AI) has ushered in an era of unprecedented possibilities and, at the same time, poses significant threats in the media landscape. As a potent tool, AI can streamline operations, offering innovative solutions like content personalization, predictive analytics, and augmented reality experiences that can enhance user engagement and boost the media industry’s economic viability. These opportunities allow for a more immersive and personalized user experience, leveraging data to create content that is finely tuned to individual preferences and trends. However, the integration of AI in media does not come without its challenges. The threat of deep fakes and the dissemination of misinformation stand as substantial concerns, with AI technologies facilitating the creation of highly convincing fake content that can manipulate perceptions and sow discord. Moreover, the autonomy given to AI systems can potentially lead to job displacements and raise ethical concerns regarding privacy and data security. Despite these threats, when wielded responsibly and ethically, AI can usher in a new golden age for media characterized by creativity, efficiency, and innovation. As the media industry stands at this crossroads, it must navigate the fine balance between leveraging AI’s opportunities and mitigating its potential threats, fostering a landscape that upholds truth, ethics, and human value at its core. It is imperative for stakeholders to collaborate, devising strategies and regulatory frameworks to ensure AI serves as a force for good, steering media towards a future that embodies progress and inclusivity.

Countering Algorithmic Bias and Disinformation and Effectively Harnessing the Power of AI in Media

Justice in Misinformation Detection Systems: An Analysis of Algorithms, Stakeholders, and Potential Harms

Smart Media or Biased Media: The Impacts and Challenges of AI and Big Data on the Media Industry

Can an Algorithm Reduce the Perceived Bias of News? Testing the Effect of Machine Attribution on News Readers’ Evaluations of Bias, Anthropomorphism, and Credibility

Counterspeakers' Perspectives: Unveiling Barriers and AI Needs in the Fight against Online Hate

The Ethical Revolution: Challenges and Reflections in the Face of the Integration of Artificial Intelligence in Digital Journalism

Combating Misinformation and Polarization in the Corporate Sphere: Integrating Social, Technological and AI Strategies

Behind the black box: The moderating role of the machine heuristic on the effect of transparency information about automated journalism on hostile media bias perception

Removing AI’s Sentiment Manipulation of Personalized News Delivery

Artificial Intelligence in Automated Detection of Disinformation: A Thematic Analysis

Addressing the Impact of Artificial Intelligence on Journalism: the perception of experts, journalists and academics

Rating Reliability and Bias in News Articles: Does AI Assistance Help Everyone?

Automated news recommendation in front of adversarial examples and the technical limits of transparency in algorithmic accountability

Dilemma and coping strategies of news communication based on artificial intelligence and big data

Impact of Artificial Intelligence News Source Credibility Identification System on Effectiveness of Media Literacy Education

The Effects of AI-based Credibility Indicators on the Detection and Spread of Misinformation under Social Influence

The E�ects of AI-based Credibility Indicators on the Detection and Spread of Misinformation under Social Influence

Mitigating Biases in Collective Decision-Making: Enhancing Performance in the Face of Fake News

Combating Misinformation and Fake News: The Potential of AI and Media Literacy Education

The Dual Nature of AI in Information Dissemination: Ethical Considerations

Artificial Intelligence for Media: Opportunities or Threats