Abstract:Despite the widespread availability of artificial intelligence (AI) products and services, consumer evaluations and adoption intentions have not met expectations. Existing research mainly focuses on AI's instrumental attributes from the consumer perspective, along with negative impacts of AI failures on evaluations and willingness to use. However, research is lacking on AI as a collaborative agent, investigating the impact of human-AI collaboration on AI acceptance under different outcome expectations. This study examines the interactive effects of human-AI collaboration types (AI-dominant vs. AI-assisted) and outcome expectations (positive vs. negative) on AI product evaluations and usage willingness, along with the underlying mechanisms, from a human-AI relationship perspective. It also investigates the moderating role of algorithm transparency in these effects. Using three online experiments with analysis of variance and bootstrap methods, the study validates these interactive mechanisms, revealing the mediating role of attribution and moderating role of algorithm transparency. Experiment 1 confirms the interactive effects of human-AI collaboration types and outcome expectations on consumer evaluations and usage willingness. Under positive outcome expectations, consumers evaluate and express willingness to use AI-dominant intelligent vehicles with autonomous driving capabilities higher than those with emergency evasion capabilities (AI-assisted). However, under negative outcome expectations, consumers rate autonomous driving capabilities lower compared to emergency evasion capabilities. Experiment 2 examines the mediating role of attribution through ChatGPT's dominant or assisting role under different outcome expectations. Experiment 3 uses a clinical decision-making system to study algorithm transparency's moderating role, showing higher transparency improves evaluations and willingness to use AI products and services under negative outcome expectations. Theoretically, this study advances consumer behavior research by exploring the human-AI relationship within artificial intelligence, enhancing understanding of consumer acceptance variations. Practically, it offers insights for better integrating AI products and services into the market.

Behind the black box: The moderating role of the machine heuristic on the effect of transparency information about automated journalism on hostile media bias perception

Can an Algorithm Reduce the Perceived Bias of News? Testing the Effect of Machine Attribution on News Readers’ Evaluations of Bias, Anthropomorphism, and Credibility

When AI moderates online content: effects of human collaboration and interactive transparency on user trust

Automated journalism: The effects of AI authorship and evaluative information on the perception of a science journalism article

Disclosure of AI-Generated News Increases Engagement but Does Not Reduce Aversion, Despite Positive Quality Ratings

How transparency modulates trust in artificial intelligence

What Are You Hiding? Algorithmic Transparency and User Perceptions

User Perceptions of AI-Based Comment Filtering Technology

Transparency improves the accuracy of automation use, but automation confidence information does not

Rating Reliability and Bias in News Articles: Does AI Assistance Help Everyone?

Unveiling the Hidden Agenda: Biases in News Reporting and Consumption

Consumer responses to human-AI collaboration at organizational frontlines: strategies to escape algorithm aversion in content creation

"I had a solid theory before but it's falling apart": Polarizing Effects of Algorithmic Transparency

Removing AI’s Sentiment Manipulation of Personalized News Delivery

The effects of journalistic transparency on credibility assessments and engagement intentions

How Much Information?: Effects of Transparency on Trust in an Algorithmic Interface

Countering Algorithmic Bias and Disinformation and Effectively Harnessing the Power of AI in Media

Machine-Learning media bias

The nudging effect of AIGC labeling on users' perceptions of automated news: evidence from EEG

The impact of human-AI collaboration types on consumer evaluation and usage intention: a perspective of responsibility attribution

Hostile media bias on social media: Testing the effect of user comments on perceptions of news bias and credibility