Abstract:The spread of misinformation on social media has led to the development of artificial intelligence (AI) tools to deal with this phenomenon. These tools are particularly needed when misinformation relates to natural or anthropogenic disasters such as the COVID-19 pandemic. The major research question of our work was as follows: what kind of gatekeepers (i.e. news moderators) do we wish social media algorithms and users to be when misinformation on hazards and disasters is being dealt with? To address this question, we carried out a meta-analysis of studies published in Scopus and Web of Science. We extracted 668 papers that contained keyterms related to the topic of "AI tools to deal with misinformation on social media during hazards and disasters." The methodology included several steps. First, we selected 13 review papers to identify relevant variables and refine the scope of our meta-analysis. Then we screened the rest of the papers and identified 266 publications as being significant for our research goals. For each eligible paper, we analyzed its objective, sponsor's location, year of publication, research area, type of hazard, and related topics. As methods of analysis, we applied: descriptive statistics, network representation of keyword co-occurrences, and flow representation of research rationale. Our results show that few studies come from the social sciences (5.8%) and humanities (3.5%), and that most of those papers are dedicated to the COVID-19 risk (92%). Most of the studies deal with the question of detecting misinformation (68%). Few countries are major funders of the development of the topic. These results allow some inferences. Social sciences and humanities seem underrepresented for a topic that is strongly connected to human reasoning. A reflection on the optimum balance between algorithm recommendations and user choices seems to be missing. Research results on the pandemic could be exploited to enhance research advances on other risks.

Combating Misinformation and Polarization in the Corporate Sphere: Integrating Social, Technological and AI Strategies

Human-Misinformation interaction: Understanding the interdisciplinary approach needed to computationally combat false information

Uses and Risks of Artificial Intelligence in Electoral Campaigns 2023: Delphi Survey of Strategic Experts in Colombia

Characterizing Fake News Targeting Corporations

Mapping automatic social media information disorder. The role of bots and AI in spreading misleading information in society

The Polarizing Impact of Political Disinformation and Hate Speech: A Cross-country Configural Narrative

Polarization and Fake News: Early Warning of Potential Misinformation Targets

Synthetic Lies: Understanding AI-Generated Misinformation and Evaluating Algorithmic and Human Solutions

Understanding the Causes and Solutions of AI Induced Misinformation Impacting the Decision Making Behavior of Students

Systematic meta-analysis of research on AI tools to deal with misinformation on social media during natural and anthropogenic hazards and disasters

Understanding and combatting misinformation across 16 countries on six continents

The Effects of AI-based Credibility Indicators on the Detection and Spread of Misinformation under Social Influence

Misinformation vs. Situational Awareness: The Art of Deception and the Need for Cross-Domain Detection

From Perils to Possibilities: Understanding how Human (and AI) Biases affect Online Fora

Studying Fake News Spreading, Polarisation Dynamics, and Manipulation by Bots: a Tale of Networks and Language

The Dual Nature of AI in Information Dissemination: Ethical Considerations

Rational Silence and False Polarization: How Viewpoint Organizations and Recommender Systems Distort the Expression of Public Opinion

Who should fight the spread of fake news?

Justice in Misinformation Detection Systems: An Analysis of Algorithms, Stakeholders, and Potential Harms

Technology, Propaganda, and the Limits of Human Intellect

Regulating Disinformation and Big Tech in the EU: A Research Agenda on the Institutional Strategies, Public Spheres and Analytical Challenges