Abstract:To maximise running economy (RE), shoe manufacturers placed carbon plates within the midsole of shoes. Shoe technology research is limited on understanding the variability of individual responses to carbon-plated shoes and how these responses vary across running velocities. Little research on same shoe characteristics with and without a stiff element has been completed. This study aimed to investigate how running shoes with carbon versus without a carbon composite stiff element alter individual running biomechanics and the metabolic cost of running. Ethical approval was gained from Cardiff Metropolitan University Ethics Committee. Ten male athletes (69 ± 9 kg; 174 ± 4 cm; 28 ± 9 years) completed two submaximal incremental treadmill runs. One test was completed in a shoe without carbon (C1), the other test was completed in carbon shoes (C2), the order of testing for each shoe were randomised. Running velocity started at 9 km/h and increased by 1 km/h every four mins, blood lactate samples were taken after every stage. Once 4 mmol·L−1 (OBLA; the second lactate turn point) had been reached one more stage was completed. Gas exchange was analysed throughout the whole test. The first 15 s of the final 2 minutes of each stage was recorded using Theia3D markerless motion capture software (Theia3Dv2022.1.0.2309, Theia Markerless, Inc., Kingston, ON, Canada). Data were analysed in 4 stages, the initial stage, pre-OBLA, OBLA and post-OBLA. Physiology data were averaged over the final two mins of each stage. Discrete joint angles were taken from each stage, and an average of the 15 s recording was taken for spatiotemporal measure. Data were analysed using a four-way repeat measures ANOVA, to show individual differences. Non-parametric data were analysed using Wilcoxon signed-rank test. Hedges g calculations were completed to calculate effect size (ES). Results showed significant increase in flight time (FT; P = 0.04, ES = 0.20) in the pre-OBLA stage when using C2. Metatarsophalangeal joint (MTP) dorsiflexion showed significant increase during the initial stage in C2 (P = 0.05, ES = 0.8), and ankle dorsiflexion had significant increase in the post-OBLA stage in C2 (P = 0.03, ES = 0.2). The were no significant differences present in the physiology data. Across the physiological, spatiotemporal and kinematics, high dispersions around the mean were exhibited. Findings suggest that to improve RE, mechanical and spatiotemporal changes need to be present when using C2. Further findings show carbon shoes elicit highly individual responses to both RE and mechanics of running.

Ergogenic distance running shoes: how do we think they work and how can we understand them better?

Effects of longitudinal bending stiffness and midsole foam on running energetics

Energetics and Biomechanics of Running Footwear with Increased Longitudinal Bending Stiffness: A Narrative Review

The Biomechanics of Competitive Male Runners in Three Marathon Racing Shoes: A Randomized Crossover Study

Evolution of distance running shoes: performance, injuries, and rules

Towards a biomechanical understanding of performance improvement with advanced running shoes

A Comparison of the Energetic Cost of Running in Marathon Racing Shoes

Role of midsole hollow structure in energy storage and return in running shoes

Curved carbon plates inside running shoes modified foot and shank angular velocity improving mechanical efficiency at the ankle joint

The effect of carbon fiber plated shoes on submaximal running mechanics in non-elite runners

A biomechanical comparison of track spikes with advanced footwear technology to a traditional track spike in female distance runners

Injury and performance-related running biomechanics in advanced footwear technology compared to minimalist footwear

Can the recent sex-specific evolutions in elite running performances be attributed to advanced footwear technology?

How athletes’ biomechanical running characteristics effect running economy during the use of running shoes with and without carbon inserts

Running Shoes of the Postmodern Footwear Era: A Narrative Overview of Advanced Footwear Technology

Shoe midsole longitudinal bending stiffness and running economy, joint energy, and EMG

Greater foot and footwear mechanical work associated with less ankle joint work during running

The stiff plate location into the shoe influences the running biomechanics

The Impact of Grounding in Running Shoes on Indices of Performance in Elite Competitive Athletes

The Effects of Increased Midsole Bending Stiffness of Sport Shoes on Muscle-Tendon Unit Shortening and Shortening Velocity: a Randomised Crossover Trial in Recreational Male Runners

Metabolic cost of level, uphill, and downhill running in highly cushioned shoes with carbon-fiber plates