Abstract:To maximise running economy (RE), shoe manufacturers placed carbon plates within the midsole of shoes. Shoe technology research is limited on understanding the variability of individual responses to carbon-plated shoes and how these responses vary across running velocities. Little research on same shoe characteristics with and without a stiff element has been completed. This study aimed to investigate how running shoes with carbon versus without a carbon composite stiff element alter individual running biomechanics and the metabolic cost of running. Ethical approval was gained from Cardiff Metropolitan University Ethics Committee. Ten male athletes (69 ± 9 kg; 174 ± 4 cm; 28 ± 9 years) completed two submaximal incremental treadmill runs. One test was completed in a shoe without carbon (C1), the other test was completed in carbon shoes (C2), the order of testing for each shoe were randomised. Running velocity started at 9 km/h and increased by 1 km/h every four mins, blood lactate samples were taken after every stage. Once 4 mmol·L−1 (OBLA; the second lactate turn point) had been reached one more stage was completed. Gas exchange was analysed throughout the whole test. The first 15 s of the final 2 minutes of each stage was recorded using Theia3D markerless motion capture software (Theia3Dv2022.1.0.2309, Theia Markerless, Inc., Kingston, ON, Canada). Data were analysed in 4 stages, the initial stage, pre-OBLA, OBLA and post-OBLA. Physiology data were averaged over the final two mins of each stage. Discrete joint angles were taken from each stage, and an average of the 15 s recording was taken for spatiotemporal measure. Data were analysed using a four-way repeat measures ANOVA, to show individual differences. Non-parametric data were analysed using Wilcoxon signed-rank test. Hedges g calculations were completed to calculate effect size (ES). Results showed significant increase in flight time (FT; P = 0.04, ES = 0.20) in the pre-OBLA stage when using C2. Metatarsophalangeal joint (MTP) dorsiflexion showed significant increase during the initial stage in C2 (P = 0.05, ES = 0.8), and ankle dorsiflexion had significant increase in the post-OBLA stage in C2 (P = 0.03, ES = 0.2). The were no significant differences present in the physiology data. Across the physiological, spatiotemporal and kinematics, high dispersions around the mean were exhibited. Findings suggest that to improve RE, mechanical and spatiotemporal changes need to be present when using C2. Further findings show carbon shoes elicit highly individual responses to both RE and mechanics of running.

The effect of carbon fiber plated shoes on submaximal running mechanics in non-elite runners

How athletes’ biomechanical running characteristics effect running economy during the use of running shoes with and without carbon inserts

Footwear-specific biomechanical and energetic responses to 8 weeks of training in advanced footwear technology

The Biomechanics of Competitive Male Runners in Three Marathon Racing Shoes: A Randomized Crossover Study

Metabolic cost of level, uphill, and downhill running in highly cushioned shoes with carbon-fiber plates

Injury and performance-related running biomechanics in advanced footwear technology compared to minimalist footwear

The Influence of “Super-Shoes” and Foot Strike Pattern on Metabolic Cost and Joint Mechanics in Competitive Female Runners

A Comparison of the Energetic Cost of Running in Marathon Racing Shoes

Carbon Plate Shoes Improve Metabolic Power and Performance in Recreational Runners.

An Observational Study of the Effect of Nike Vaporfly Shoes on Marathon Performance

Biomechanics and subjective measures of recreational male runners in three shoes running outdoors: a randomised crossover study

The Impact of Grounding in Running Shoes on Indices of Performance in Elite Competitive Athletes

Effects of longitudinal bending stiffness and midsole foam on running energetics

Towards a biomechanical understanding of performance improvement with advanced running shoes

Influence of advanced shoe technology on the top 100 annual performances in men’s marathon from 2015 to 2019

Ergogenic distance running shoes: how do we think they work and how can we understand them better?

A biomechanical comparison of track spikes with advanced footwear technology to a traditional track spike in female distance runners

Longitudinal bending stiffness does not affect running economy in Nike Vaporfly Shoes

Influence of advanced footwear technology spikes on middle- and long-distance running performance measures in trained runners

Effects of nail softness and stiffness with distance running shoes on ground reaction forces and vertical loading rates in male elite long-distance runners with pronated feet

Effect of the Construction of Carbon Fiber Plate Insert to Midsole on Running Performance