Towards a biomechanical understanding of performance improvement with advanced running shoes
B. M. Nigg,A. Subramanium,E. S. Matijevich
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/19424280.2022.2127543
2022-11-23
Footwear Science
Abstract:It has been proposed, that 'the better running economy and personal best time obtained with the VP4 [Vaporfly 4% or similar advanced shoe constructions] cannot be currently explained from a [functional] biomechanical standpoint' (Patoz et al., 2022 ). It seems that the biomechanics research community doesn't know (a) which footwear features are the most important with respect to improvements in running performance and (b) don't know why specific features influence running performance. A combination of footwear features like compliant and resilient midsole material (Healey and Hoogkamer, 2021 ; Hoogkamer et al., 2019 ), heel drop (Burns & Tam, 2020 ; Nigg et al., 2020 ), stiff curved carbon-fibre plate (Burns & Tam, 2020 ; Hoogkamer et al., 2019 ; Nigg et al., 2020 ; Subramanium & Nigg, 2021 ) and/or forefoot lift (Nigg et al., 2020 ) have been proposed as major reasons for the performance improvement achieved when running in footwear with these features. However, explanations for why these footwear features would improve performance have typically not been proposed by researchers. One exception is the 'teeter-totter effect' (Nigg et al., 2020 ), which has been proposed as a mechanism for how these shoes improve performance. However, the 'teeter-totter effect' mechanism needs still to be demonstrated with experimental evidence.