Early and Intermediate Clinical Effects of Cruciate-Retain and Cruciate-Substitute Medial Pivot Knee Prosthesis
W. Wang,P. Yuan,K. Wang
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joca.2019.02.597
IF: 7.507
2019-01-01
Osteoarthritis and Cartilage
Abstract:Purpose: To investigate the early and intermediate effects of cruciate-retain ( CR ) and cruciate-substitute ( CS ) medial pivot knee prosthesis. Methods: From January 2013 to January 2015, the data of patients with severe osteoarthritis who underwent primary total knee arthroplasty with the above two kinds of prosthesis were analyzed retrospectively. All patients were divided into the cruciate-retain ( CR ) group (n=171 ) and cruciate-substitute (CS) group ( n=200 ). KSS, SF-36 health survey, maximum knee flexion were compared between the 2 groups 3 months, 6 months, 1 year, 2 years, 3 years, and 5 years postoperatively. Results: KSS ( CR ): 3 months ( 89.61 ± 0.91 ), 6 months ( 88.68 ± 0.95 ), 1 year ( 87.61 ± 1.09 ), 2 years ( 89.38 ± 0.97 ), 3 years ( 88.18 ± 0.89 ), 5 years ( 89.63 ± 0.89 ), significantly improved than that before the operation ( 50.72 ± 1.55 ) ( P < 0.05 ); KSS ( CS ): 3 months ( 87.63 ± 0.93 ), 6 months ( 89.48 ± 1.12 ), 1 year ( 89.68 ± 0.99 ), 2 years ( 88.48 ± 0.96 ), 3 years ( 91.61 ± 0.95 ), 5 years ( 90.61 ± 0.94 ), significantly improved than that before the operation ( 51.54 ± 1.48 ) ( P < 0.05 ). Maximum knee flexion ( CR ): 3 months ( 100.4 ± 11.4 ), 6 months ( 115.2 ± 21.5 ), 1 year ( 117.6 ± 11.7 ), > 1 year ( 118.2 ± 11.2 ), significantly improved than that before the operation ( 70.6 ± 12.7 ) ( P < 0.05 ); maximum knee flexion ( CS ): 3 months ( 100.6 ± 11.3 ), 6 months ( 101.4 ± 15.3 ), 1 year ( 121.1 ± 12.3 ), > 1 year ( 121.3 ± 12.4 ), significantly improved than that before the operation ( 74.8 ± 12.8 ) ( P < 0.05 ). Physical function, physical role, pain, general health, energy, social function, emotional function, and mental health were compared with the data at the same time points before and after surgery ( P < 0.05 ), and different time points within and between the 2 groups ( P > 0.05 ). Conclusions: Early effects of CR and CS are both good in the treatment of severe knee arthritis, which can correct the deformity and improve the knee flexion to some extent. However, no significant differences are found in the improvement of knee ROM and patients’ satisfaction.