Abstract:Abstract Purpose Various alignment philosophies for total knee arthroplasty (TKA) have been described, all striving to achieve excellent long-term implant survival and good functional outcomes. In recent years, in search of higher functionality and patient satisfaction, a shift towards more tailored and patient-specific alignment is seen. The purpose of this study was to describe a restricted ‘inverse kinematic alignment’ (iKA) technique, and to compare clinical outcomes of patients that underwent robotic-assisted TKA performed by restricted iKA vs. adjusted mechanical alignment (aMA). Methods The authors reviewed the records of a consecutive series of patients that received robotic-assisted TKA with restricted iKA ( n = 40) and with aMA ( n = 40). Oxford Knee Score (OKS) and satisfaction on a visual analogue scale (VAS) were collected at a follow-up of 12 months. Clinical outcomes were assessed according to patient acceptable symptom state (PASS) thresholds, and uni- and multivariable linear regression analyses were performed to determine associations of OKS and satisfaction with six variables (age, sex, body mass index (BMI), preoperative hip–knee–ankle (HKA) angle, preoperative OKS, alignment technique). Results The restricted iKA and aMA techniques yielded comparable outcome scores ( p = 0.069), with OKS, respectively, 44.6 ± 3.5 and 42.2 ± 6.3. VAS Satisfaction was better ( p = 0.012) with restricted iKA (9.2 ± 0.8) compared to aMA (8.5 ± 1.3). The number of patients that achieved OKS and satisfaction PASS thresholds was significantly higher ( p = 0.049 and p = 0.003, respectively) using restricted iKA (98% and 80%) compared to aMA (85% and 48%). Knees with preoperative varus deformity, achieved significantly ( p = 0.025) better OKS using restricted iKA (45.4 ± 2.0) compared to aMA (41.4 ± 6.8). Multivariable analyses confirmed better OKS ( β = 3.1; p = 0.007) and satisfaction ( β = 0.73; p = 0.005) with restricted iKA. Conclusions The results of this study suggest that restricted iKA and aMA grant comparable clinical outcomes at 12-month follow-up, though a greater proportion of knees operated by restricted iKA achieved the PASS thresholds for OKS and satisfaction. Notably. in knees with preoperative varus deformity, restricted iKA yielded significantly better OKS and satisfaction than aMA. Level of evidence Level III, comparative study.

Low‐constraint insert with a medial pivot design as a potential predictor of favourable outcomes in cruciate‐retaining total knee arthroplasty: A propensity score‐matched analysis

Anterior Position of the Femoral Condyle During Mid-Flexion Worsens Knee Activity After Cruciate-Retaining Total Knee Arthroplasty

Load-Dependent Characteristics of Cruciate-Retaining and Posterior-Stabilized Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Biomechanical Study

Risk of tibial baseplate loosening is low in patients following unrestricted kinematic alignment total knee arthroplasty using a cruciate‐retaining medial conforming insert: A study using radiostereometric analysis at 2 years

Higher satisfaction and function scores in restricted kinematic alignment versus mechanical alignment with medial pivot design total knee arthroplasty: A prospective randomised controlled trial

Both Intraoperative Medial and Lateral Joint Stabilities at Midflexion Influence Postoperative Patient-Reported Outcome Measures Following Bi-Cruciate Stabilized Total Knee Arthroplasty

Intraoperative Kinematics in Posterior Cruciate Ligament Retaining Total Knee Arthroplasty Using Different Inserts

Comparison of postoperative clinical outcomes and knee stability of cruciate-retaining total knee arthroplasty using the tibia-first gap navigation technique with a computer-aided system and measured-resection technique: A retrospective analysis of a propensity-matched cohort

Effect of Joint Line Elevation after Posterior-stabilized and Cruciate-retaining Total Knee Arthroplasty on Clinical Function and Kinematics

Association Between Overhang of the Posterior Femoral Condyle and Restricted Postoperative Knee Flexion Related to Patient-Reported Stiffness in Medial-Pivot Total Knee Arthroplasty

Posterior Cruciate Ligament Preservation versus Posterior Cruciate Ligament Sacrifice: Comparing Patient Outcomes in Medial Congruent Total Knee Arthroplasty

Effect of"high-flex"versus"standard"polyethylene tibial inserts on long-term range of motion after total knee arthroplasty:a randomized controlled study

The significance of the pelvic incidence measurement as a possible predictor of TKA outcome

Total knee arthroplasty using a cemented single-radius, condylar-stabilized design performed without posterior cruciate ligament sacrifice

Steep medial posterior tibial slope angle and ramp lesion are independent risk factors for an increase in quantitatively measured pivot shift in patients with ACL-deficient knees

Posterior tibial slope impacts intraoperatively measured mid-flexion anteroposterior kinematics during cruciate-retaining total knee arthroplasty

Retention of the posterior cruciate ligament stabilizes the medial femoral condyle during kneeling using a tibial insert with ball-in-socket medial conformity

[Influence of the insert design on clinical results and kinematics of the knee after total knee arthroplasty]

Subjective grade of apprehension during the pivot‐shift test reflects patient‐reported outcomes more than conventional pivot‐shift test grade after ACL reconstruction

Higher satisfaction after total knee arthroplasty using restricted inverse kinematic alignment compared to adjusted mechanical alignment

Kinematics and kinetics comparison of ultra-congruent versus medial-pivot designs for total knee arthroplasty by multibody analysis