Effect of"high-flex"versus"standard"polyethylene tibial inserts on long-term range of motion after total knee arthroplasty:a randomized controlled study

Hong CAI,Ke ZHANG,Ran ZHAO,Hong YANG,Fengying WANG
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.2095-9958.2017.01-04
2017-01-01
Abstract:Background: Many implant designs have been modified to a high-flex version for increasing range of motion (ROM) after total knee arthroplasty (TKA). However, its clinical benefits remain unconfirmed. Objective:To investigate the effect of"high-flex"versus"standard"polyethylene tibial inserts on long-term ROM and clinical outcomes after TKA. Meth-ods:A total of 150 patients who underwent TKA by one surgeon from February 2009 to October 2010 were enrolled into a pro-spective, blinded, randomized clinical trial. Of them, 75 patients received a high-flex insert and the other 75 received a stan-dard insert. There were no differences in the baseline information between two groups (P>0.05). All patients received the iden-tical operation, pain management and rehabilitation protocol. With minimum 5-year follow-up, the ROM, maximum flexion angle, and HSS, WOMAC, anterior knee pain VAS scores were recorded and compared between two groups. Results:Eventu-ally, 56 patients in high-flex group and 54 patients in standard group were followed for 63.1 and 62.7 months on average, re-spectively. There was no significant difference in any outcome measures (ROM, maximum flexion angle, HSS, WOMAC, an-terior knee pain VAS scores) before operation or at the last follow-up between the two groups (P>0.05). Conclusions:The high-flex insert can not increase long-term ROM or maximum flexion angle after TKA as compared with a standard insert.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?