Abstract:Aim: This prospective multicenter randomized controlled clinical trial was designed to compare the clinical outcomes of papilla preservation flap surgery with or without the application of enamel matrix derivatives (EMD). This article reports on early healing events, post-operative morbidity and patient perceptions of the surgical outcomes. Material and Methods: One hundred and seventy-two patients with advanced chronic periodontitis and at least one intrabony defect of greater than or equal to3 mm were recruited in 12 centres in seven countries (European Research Group on Periodontology (ERGOPERIO)). Papilla preservation flaps were used to obtain access and primary closure. After debridement, and root conditioning, EMD was applied in the test subjects, and omitted in the controls. Healing was monitored 1, 2, 3, 4, 6 and 12 weeks after surgery. During the first 12 weeks of healing, supracrestal soft-tissue density was evaluated with a computer-assisted densitometric image analysis system (CADIA) using underexposed radiographs taken on a subset of 34 patients. Patient perceptions were evaluated with a questionnaire immediately after the procedure, at suture removal 1 week later and at 1 year. Results: Subjects reported little intraoperative or post-operative pain or discomfort for both test and controls. Twenty-four percent of controls and 30% of tests (p=0.64) reported a degree of interference with daily activities for an average of 3 and 3.5 days, respectively. Post-surgical edema was noted in 25% of tests and 28% of controls. Wound dehiscence in the interdental portion of the flap was uncommon (14% of tests and 12% of controls at week 1) and of limited size. Root sensitivity was the most frequent post-operative adverse event: it affected 45% of test and 35% of controls (p=0.55). Up to 6 weeks post-operatively, soft-tissue densities were significantly higher in subjects treated with EMD with respect to controls. One year after completion of the surgery, patients reported high levels of satisfaction with the outcomes. The most frequently reported benefits included the ability to preserve a tooth/dentition and to maintain/improve chewing ability. The cost and need for frequent follow-ups were cited as significant drawbacks. Conclusions: This study portrayed the early healing events, pain, discomfort and adverse events of papilla preservation flap surgery and the 1-year patient perceptions of the benefits and disadvantages of periodontal surgery in intrabony defects. Earlier gains in soft-tissue density were observed following application of EMD. In terms of patient-centered outcomes, however, both procedures performed in a similar manner.

Do Gingival Soft Tissues Benefit From the Application of a Papilla Preservation Flap Technique in Endodontic Surgery?

The Simplified Papilla Preservation Flap. A Novel Surgical Approach for the Management of Soft Tissues in Regenerative Procedures

The Simplified Papilla Preservation Flap in the Regenerative Treatment of Deep Intrabony Defects: Clinical Outcomes and Postoperative Morbidity

New surgery approaches preserving entire papilla to treat isolated interdental intrabony defects: A narrative review

Healing, post-operative morbidity and patient perception of outcomes following regenerative therapy of deep intrabony defects.

Comparison Of Gingival Blood Flow During Healing Of Simplified Papilla Preservation And Modified Widman Flap Surgery: A Clinical Trial Using Laser Doppler Flowmetry

Endoscopic Re‐Instrumentation of Intrabony Defect–Associated Deep Residual Periodontal Pockets Is Non‐Inferior to Papilla Preservation Flap Surgery: A Randomized Trial

Evaluation of Post-Operative Morbidity and Palatal Wound Healing after Implant Uncovering Surgical Procedure Performed with Apically Positioned Flap (APF) and Leukocyte and Platelet-Rich-Fibrin (L-PRF): An Original Technique

Prevention of gingival recession following flap debridement surgery by subepithelial connective tissue graft: consecutive case series

The Modified Papilla Preservation Technique With Bioresorbable Barrier Membranes In The Treatment Of Intrabony Defects. Case Reports.

[Advances in the periodontal surgical flaps techniques to preserve gingival papilla].

Non‐surgical retreatment versus papillary preservation flap surgery for residual pockets: A randomized controlled trial with clinical and patient‐reported outcomes

Interimplant papilla reconstruction: assessment of soft tissue changes and results of 12 consecutive cases

Clinical Outcomes Following Treatment of Human Intrabony Defects with GTR/bone Replacement Material or Access Flap Alone. A Multicenter Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial.

[Comparison of clinical effects between periodontal endoscopy aiding subgingival debridement and flap surgery].

Extraction socket healing in humans after ridge preservation techniques: comparison between flapless and flapped procedures in a randomized clinical trial

Modified interproximal tunneling technique with customized sub-epithelial connective tissue graft for gingival papilla reconstruction: report of three cases with a cutback incision on the palatal side

Clinical evaluation and biological understanding of the early step-by-step healing after periodontal microsurgery: A case report with PES analysis comparing initial and 31-day result

Clinical Performance of Access Flap Surgery in the Treatment of the Intrabony Defect. A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Clinical Trials.

Periodontal granulation tissue preservation in surgical periodontal disease treatment: a pilot prospective cohort study

The role of subepithelial connective tissue graft for reconstruction of interdental papilla: Clinical study