Abstract:The problem of culturally, linguistically, and economically diverse (CLED) student underrepresentation in gifted programs demonstrates a need to examine systemic processes, including the building of systemic capacity at the district and school levels where policies for gifted programs are formed and implemented. To examine the effects of this process on one diverse district’s gifted identification and services, we conducted 10 focus group interviews with 61 participants including gifted coordinators, teacher leaders, and gifted facilitators in the middle of a district initiative aimed at improving equitable identification and services in its gifted program. Data were analyzed using the six-phase approach of Thematic Analysis, which included (1) familiarization, (2) coding, (3) searching for themes, (4) reviewing themes, (5) defining and naming themes, and then (6) writing our report. Three overarching themes emerged from the in-depth analysis: (1) building systemic capacity, (2) shifting conceptions of giftedness, and (3) equitable identification practices and inclusive programming. Findings indicated the importance of systemic capacity building in teachers for improved CLED student identification into gifted programs and services. Essentially, building systemic capacity and shifting conceptions of giftedness share a reciprocal relationship in leading to more equitable gifted identification practices and inclusive programming. Moreover, implementing flexible and nuanced policy that takes into consideration school climate and culture is critical to building systemic capacity while working toward goals of equity. Recommendations are provided for researchers and practitioners based on these major findings.

What Works in Gifted Education

Describing the Status of Programs for the Gifted

Gifted Programming Standards

The Effects of Clustering and Curriculum on the Development of Gifted Learners' Math Achievement

A Content Analysis of Selected State Plans for Gifted and Talented Education

Identifying and Serving Gifted and Talented Students: Are Identification and Services Connected?

Concordance of Gifted Education Policy and Practices at the State, District, and Local Levels

Building Systemic Capacity to Improve Identification and Services in Gifted Education: A Case Study of One District

Development and Evaluation of a Pioneer School-Based Gifted Education Program (Project GIFT) for Primary and Secondary Students in Hong Kong

Designing an integrated curriculum for gifted learners: An organizational framework

Consequences of Implementing Curricular-Aligned Strategies for Identifying Rural Gifted Students

Barriers to Underserved Students’ Participation in Gifted Programs and Possible Solutions

Eight Universal Truths of Identifying Students for Advanced Academic Interventions

Teach Students What They Don’t Know but Are Ready to Learn

What Longitudinal Research and Large-Scale Population Representative Studies Can Tell Us About Gifted Students and Education Policy 50 Years After the Marland Report

The Effectiveness of Current Interventions to Reverse the Underachievement of Gifted Students: Findings of a Meta-Analysis and Systematic Review

Specific cognitive aptitudes and gifted samples

Professional Development and Differentiated Instruction in an Elementary School Pullout Program: A Gifted Education Case Study

Gifted Students’ Perceptions of Gifted Programs: An Inquiry Into Their Academic and Social-Emotional Functioning