Discourse and the Translator

B. Hatim,Ian Mason

DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315846583

2014-06-17

Abstract:Discourse and the Translator both incorporates and moves beyond previous studies of translation. Its logical and informative approach to the problems of translation ensures that it will be essential for all those who work with languages 'in contact'. Incorporating research in sociolinguistics, discourse studies, pragmatics and semiotics, the authors analyse the process and product of translation in their social contexts. Through this analysis, the book emphasises the importance of the translator as a mediator between cultures.

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

The paper "Discourse and the Translator" attempts to address several core issues in translation studies, which mainly revolve around the nature, process, and result of translation. Specifically:

1. **Translation as a communicative process**:
- The authors Basil Hatim and Ian Mason emphasize that translation is not just a language conversion but a complex communicative process. In this process, the translator needs to negotiate meaning between the producer of the source - language text (ST) and the readers of the target - language text (TT).
- The translator's behavior is influenced by his or her social background and at the same time needs to consider the respective social frameworks of the source text and the target text.

2. **The process and product of translation**:
- The paper distinguishes between the process of translation (translating as process) and the product of translation (translation as product). Traditional translation evaluation often focuses on the final product, that is, the target text, while ignoring the decision - making and problem - solving ways that the translator faces during the translation process.
- The authors advocate that more attention should be paid to the process of translation, and systematically study the problems and solutions in translation by comparing the specific operations of the source text and the target text. For example, which techniques produce specific effects? What are the regularities in the translation process in specific genres, cultures, and historical periods?

3. **Objectivity and subjectivity**:
- The paper explores the issues of objectivity and subjectivity in evaluating translation. Although subjectivity has always existed in translation evaluation, in recent years, some scholars have attempted to establish more systematic translation criticism criteria (such as Reiss 1971, Simpson 1975, House 1976, Wilss 1982).
- The authors believe that in order to achieve objective translation evaluation, the translator's motivation as well as the intention of the source - text producer must be considered.

4. **Functional diversity in translation**:
- The paper points out that translation activities are highly diverse, and different types of translation (such as literary, religious, scientific, and technical translation) differ in social conditions and functions. However, these differences should not overshadow the commonalities among all types of translation.
- The authors propose a functionalist approach, believing that translation theory should be able to cover texts with various functions, from the Bible to bilingual packaging instructions.

In summary, this paper aims to go beyond the narrow perspective in traditional translation studies by exploring translation as a communicative process, and provide a more comprehensive framework for understanding the nature and practice of translation. This not only helps to better understand translation itself but also provides a new perspective for cross - cultural communication studies.