Abstract:Summary The functional significance of intra‐ and interspecific structural variations in the flight feathers of birds is poorly understood. Here, a phylogenetic comparative analysis of four structural features (rachis width, barb and barbule density and porosity) of proximal and distal primary feathers of 137 European bird species was conducted. Flight type (flapping and soaring, flapping and gliding, continuous flapping or passerine type), habitat (terrestrial, riparian or aquatic), wing characteristics (wing area, S and aspect ratio, AR ) and moult strategy were all found to affect feather structure to some extent. Species characterized by low wing‐beat frequency flight (soaring and gliding) have broader feather rachises (shafts) and feather vanes with lower barb density than birds associated with more active flapping modes of flight. However, the effect of flying mode on rachis width disappeared after controlling for S and AR , suggesting that rachis width is primarily determined by wing morphology. Rachis width and feather vane density are likely related to differences in force distribution across the wingspan during different flight modes. An increase in shaft diameter, barb density and porosity from the proximal to distal wing feathers was found and was highest in species with flapping flight indicating that aerodynamic forces are more biased towards the distal feathers in flapping flyers than in soarers and gliders. Habitat affected barb and barbule density, which was greatest in aquatic species, and within this group, barb density was greater in divers than non‐divers, suggesting that the need for water repellency and resistance to water penetration may influence feather structure. However, we found little support for the importance of porosity in water repellency and water penetration, because porosity was similar in aquatic, riparian and terrestrial species and among the aquatic birds (divers and non‐divers). We also found that barb density was affected by moult pattern. Our results have broad implications for the understanding of the selection pressures driving flight feather functional morphology. Specifically, the large sample size relative to any previous studies has emphasized that the morphology of flight feathers is the result of a suite of selection pressures. As well as routine flight needs, constraints during moulting, habitat (particularly aquatic) and migratory requirements also affect flight feather morphology. Identifying the exact nature of these trade‐offs will perhaps inform the reconstruction of the flying modes of extinct birds.

Interspecific variation in the structural properties of flight feathers in birds indicates adaptation to flight requirements and habitat

Functional constraints on the number and shape of flight feathers

The influence of flight style on the aerodynamic properties of avian wings as fixed lifting surfaces

The Making of a Flight Feather: Bio-architectural Principles and Adaptation

Feather function and the evolution of birds

Functional Morphology Of Gliding Flight Ii. Morphology Follows Predictions Of Gliding Performance

Phylogenetics and ecomorphology of emarginate primary feathers

Morphological Adaptations to Migration in Birds

Form and Function in Avian Flight

Flight, symmetry and barb angle evolution in the feathers of birds and other dinosaurs

774 Extreme Organization of Supra-Basal Cells Allows the Building of Modular Feather Architectures for Adaptable Flight

Functional Morphology of Gliding Flight I: Modeling Reveals Distinct Performance Landscapes Based on Soaring Strategies

How does the shape of the wing and hindlimb bones of aquatic birds relate to their locomotor abilities?

Wing morphology and flight behavior of pelecaniform seabirds

Aerodynamic Properties of Avian Flight as a Function of Wing Shape

Mechanical and structural adaptations to migration in the flight feathers of a Palaearctic passerine

Feather aerodynamics suggest importance of lift and flow predictability over drag minimization

Elevational constraints on flight efficiency shape global gradients in avian wing morphology

Flight behaviour diverges more between seasonal forms than between species in Pieris butterflies

Flight behaviour diverges more between seasonal forms than between species in butterflies

Kinematics of Wings from Caudipteryx to Modern Birds