Abstract:Mechanisms governing the migratory decisions of birds have long fascinated ecologists and sparked considerable debate. Identifying factors responsible for variation in migration distance, also known as differential migration, has been a popular approach to understanding the mechanisms underlying migratory behaviour more generally. However, research progress has been slowed by the continued testing of overlapping, non‐mechanistic, and circular predictions among a small set of historically entrenched hypotheses. We highlight the body size hypothesis and suggest that the predictions commonly tested have impeded progress because body size relationships with migration distance are predictions made by several distinct hypotheses with contrasting mechanisms. The cost of migration itself has not been adequately accounted for in most hypotheses, and we propose two flight efficiency hypotheses with time‐ and energy‐minimizing mechanisms that allow individuals to mitigate the risks inherent to longer migrations. We also advance two conceptual versions of the social dominance hypothesis based on two distinct underlying mechanisms related to distance minimization and food maximization that will help clarify the role of competition in driving migratory decisions. Overall, we describe and refine 12 mechanistic hypotheses proposed to explain differential migration (along with several other special‐case hypotheses), seven of which have underlying mechanisms related to food limitation as past research has identified this to be an important driver of differential migration. We also thoroughly reviewed 145 publications to assess the amount of support for 10 critical assumptions underlying alternative hypotheses for differential migration in birds. Our review reveals that surprisingly few studies explicitly evaluate assumptions within a differential migration context. Generating and testing strong predictions and critical assumptions underlying mechanisms of alternative hypotheses will improve our ability to differentiate among these explanations of differential migration. Additionally, future intraspecific progress will be greatest if investigators continue to focus on mechanisms underlying variation in migration distance within rather than among demographic classes, as previous research has found differing mechanisms to be responsible for differential migration among demographic classes. Interspecifically, a thorough comparative analysis that seeks to explain variation in migration distance among species would broaden both our understanding of the mechanisms regulating current differential migration patterns and those that led to the evolution of migration more generally. Collectively, we provide a framework that, together with advances in animal‐borne tracking and other technology, can be used to advance our understanding of the causes of differential migration distance, and migratory decisions more generally.

Morphological Adaptations to Migration in Birds

Mechanical and structural adaptations to migration in the flight feathers of a Palaearctic passerine

Molecular changes and physiological responses involved in migratory bird fuel management and stopover decisions

Changes in Behaviour and Proxies of Physiology Suggest Individual Variation in the Building of Migratory Phenotypes in Preparation for Long-Distance Flights

Oxidative state is associated with migration distance, but not traits linked to flight energetics

The effects of long-distance migration on the evolution of moult strategies in Western-Palearctic passerines

Body Size Shapes Inter-Specific Migratory Behaviour: Evidence from Individual Tracks of Long-Distance Migratory Shorebirds

Shared morphological consequences of global warming in North American migratory birds

Migration-induced variation of fatty acid transporters and cellular metabolic intensity in passerine birds

The underlying causes of differential migration: assumptions, hypotheses, and predictions

Heterothermic Migration Strategies in Flying Vertebrates

Differential changes in the morphology and fuel loads of obligatory and partial migrant passerines over half a century in Britain

Migration increases mitochondrial oxidative capacity without increasing reactive oxygen species emission in a songbird

Time versus energy minimization migration strategy varies with body size and season in long-distance migratory shorebirds

Mitochondrial remodelling supports migration in white-crowned sparrows (Zonotrichia leucophrys)

Molecular regulation of adiposity in a migrant, the gray catbird (1100.1)

Migration mortality in birds

Flying fast improves aerodynamic economy of heavier birds

Differential survival throughout the full annual cycle of a migratory bird presents a life-history trade-off

Macro-scale Relationship Between Body Mass and Timing of Bird Migration

Migratory lifestyle carries no added overall energy cost in a partial migratory songbird