Flight behaviour diverges more between seasonal forms than between species in Pieris butterflies

Irena Kleckova,Daniel Linke,Francisko De Moraes Rezende,Luca Rauscher,Camille Le Roy,Pável Matos‐Maraví

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/ece3.70012

IF: 3.167

2024-07-18

Ecology and Evolution

Abstract:Our study focuses on quantifying the flight behaviours of two closely related Pieris white butterflies and their seasonal forms, using high‐speed videography. Our results suggest that there are no interspecific but seasonal differences in flight behaviours. Our study provides quantitative evidence of different flight behaviours between seasonal forms of Pieris butterflies, and these differences were better predicted by forewing shape and size, rather than other factors (e.g. species identity and ambient temperature). In flying animals, wing morphology is typically assumed to influence flight behaviours. Whether seasonal polymorphism in butterfly morphology is linked to adaptive flight behaviour remains unresolved. Here, we compare the flight behaviours and wing morphologies of the spring and summer forms of two closely related butterfly species, Pieris napi and P. rapae. We first quantify three‐dimensional flight behaviour by reconstructing individual flight trajectories using stereoscopic high‐speed videography in an experimental outdoor cage. We then measure wing size and shape, which are characteristics assumed to influence flight behaviours in butterflies. We show that seasonal, but not interspecific, differences in flight behaviour might be associated with divergent forewing shapes. During spring, Pieris individuals are small and have elongated forewings, and generally fly at low speed and acceleration, while having a high flight curvature. On the contrary, summer individuals are larger and exhibit rounded forewings. They fly at high speed and acceleration, while having high turning acceleration and advance ratio. Our study provides one of the first quantitative pieces of evidence of different flight behaviours between seasonal forms of two Pieris butterfly species. We discuss the possibility that this co‐divergence in flight behaviour and morphology is an adaptation to distinct seasonal environments. Properly identifying the mechanisms underpinning such divergence, nonetheless, requires further investigations to disentangle the interacting effects of microhabitats, predator community, parasitoid pressure and behavioural differences between sexes.

ecology,evolutionary biology