Abstract:When multiple stimuli are present in the visual field, competitive interactions between stimuli could be biased by stimulus-driven and attention-driven processes (Desimone and Duncan, 1995; Beck and Kastner, 2009). To study the neural mechanisms underlying multiple-stimulus encoding, we used fMRI and forward encoding model to estimate the orientation-selective responses in human visual cortex to parafoveally presented Gabor arrays. In a heterogeneous array, a center Gabor (eccentricity = 2.5° right of fixation) was surrounded by eight flanking Gabors (0.75° from the center Gabor). The orientation of the flankers was horizontal, while the center Gabor was oriented horizontally, vertically, or ±45°. When attending to the center Gabor, observers could perfectly identify its orientation. In the main experiment, observers performed tasks unrelated to orientation. Using forward encoding model, we decomposed the multivoxel response in each visual area into responses of a hypothetical set of orientation-selective channels (Brouwer and Heeger, 2011; Saproo and Serences 2014). We found that when selective attention was on the entire array, the orientation response to the array was dominated by the orientation of the flankers. This bias increased from V1 to V4. However, when selective attention was directed to the center Gabor, the orientation response began to reflect the orientation of the center Gabor in extrastriate areas: the orientation selectivity for the center Gabor was strongest in V4 while weakest in V1. For a homogeneous array where the flanking and center Gabors had the same orientation, selective attention sharpened orientation tuning in extrastriate areas V2-V4. These findings support the idea that attention resolves the competition among multiple stimuli by counteracting the influences of nearby stimuli, resulting in enhanced information processing at the attended location. This process of biased competition is observable in as early as V2 and appears to be cumulative along the visual-processing hierarchy. Meeting abstract presented at VSS 2016

Holistic processing from learned attention to parts.

Learned Attentional Strategies in Word Holistic Processing

Behind the face of holistic perception: Holistic processing of Gestalt stimuli and faces recruit overlapping perceptual mechanisms

Individual Differences in Holistic Processing Predict Face Recognition Ability.

Influence of Perceptual Discriminability and Spatial Distance on Holistic Processing of Faces

A featural account for own-face processing? Looking for support from face inversion, composite face, and part-whole tasks

Dissociated Neural Basis of Two Behavioral Hallmarks of Holistic Face Processing: the Whole-Part Effect and Composite-Face Effect

Two faces of holistic face processing: Facilitation and interference underlying part-whole and composite effects

Holistic Processing Strategy in Cross-Species Face Perception between Dogs and Humans

Association of idiosyncratic eye-movement patterns with holistic processing of faces as measured by the composite face effect and the face inversion effect

Face and word composite effects are similarly affected by priming of local and global processing

Holistic Processing of Recognition Memory for Face Identity: Evidence from a Face Morphing Paradigm

Simulating Local Biases in Visual Attention in Neurocognitive Performance

Holistic Object Representation in Human Visual Cortex

Looking at the Upper Facial Half Enlarges the Range of Holistic Face Processing

Facilitation and interference are asymmetric in holistic face processing

Binocular rivalry reveals differential face processing in congenital prosopagnosia

Learning Acts On Distinct Processes For Visual Form Perception In The Human Brain

Spatial and Feature-selective Attention Have Distinct, Interacting Effects on Population-level Tuning

Attention Alters the Orientation Tuning for Multiple-Stimulus Displays in Human Extrastriate Visual Areas

Understanding top-down attention using task-oriented ablation design