Abstract:Eye movement strategies employed by humans to identify conspecifics are not universal. Westerners predominantly fixate the eye region during face recognition, whereas Easterners consistently focus more on the nose, yet recognition accuracy is comparable (Blais et al., 2008). However, the face literature has robustly shown that the critical information for face recognition is located in the eyes and partially the mouth, but not the nose. Moreover, since eye movements in natural viewing conditions do not provide unequivocal evidence on the measure of the visual information being used by observers, the question of whether humans universally use similar facial information to recognize faces remains unresolved. To address this issue, we monitored eye movements during face recognition of thirty Western Caucasian (WC) and thirty East Asian (EA) observers with a novel technique that parametrically restricts information outside central vision. We used ‘Spotlights’ with Gaussian apertures of 2°, 5° or 8° dynamically centered on observers' fixations. Face recognition performance improved with increasing Spotlight apertures. Regardless of culture, observers actively fixated the eyes and mouth with constrained Spotlights (2°, 5°). In the 8° condition, information from both eyes and mouth was simultaneously available when fixating the nose and, as expected, only EA observers shifted their fixations towards this region. This central location is optimal to integrate information globally, a cultural marker of Easterners' perceptual strategies. WC observers engage in analytic strategies and their facial feature-by-feature strategy was not affected by Spotlight apertures. Social experience and cultural factors shape the way humans think about the world and regulate the strategies used to extract information from faces. However, these external forces do not modulate the information used to solve this critical biological feat. Human beings rely on identical facial information to recognize conspecifics, a universal law dictated by the evolutionary constraints of nature and not nurture.

Individual Differences in Holistic Processing Predict Face Recognition Ability.

Dissociated Neural Basis of Two Behavioral Hallmarks of Holistic Face Processing: the Whole-Part Effect and Composite-Face Effect

Influence of Perceptual Discriminability and Spatial Distance on Holistic Processing of Faces

High Familiar Faces Have Both Part Recognition and Holistic Processing Advantages

Two faces of holistic face processing: Facilitation and interference underlying part-whole and composite effects

What Makes a Face a Face:A Review of Studies on Face Specificity

Association of idiosyncratic eye-movement patterns with holistic processing of faces as measured by the composite face effect and the face inversion effect

Face Recognition Subserves Nature Not Nurture

Looking at the Upper Facial Half Enlarges the Range of Holistic Face Processing

Functional Connectivity Pattern in the Core Face Network Reflects Different Mechanisms of Holistic Face Processing Measured by the Whole-Part Effect and Composite-Face Effect

The other-race effect and holistic processing across racial groups

The Fusiform Face Area is Engaged in Holistic, Not Parts-Based, Representation of Faces.

Racial Ambiguity Impairs Holistic Face Processing: Evidence from Racially Distinctive and Racially Ambiguous Faces

Individual differences in white matter microstructure of the face processing brain network are more differentiated from global fibers with increasing ability

A featural account for own-face processing? Looking for support from face inversion, composite face, and part-whole tasks

Holistic Processing of Recognition Memory for Face Identity: Evidence from a Face Morphing Paradigm

Behind the face of holistic perception: Holistic processing of Gestalt stimuli and faces recruit overlapping perceptual mechanisms

Autistic adults exhibit holistic face processing: evidence from inversion and composite face effects

Facilitation and interference are asymmetric in holistic face processing

Individual differences in cortical face selectivity predict behavioral performance in face recognition

Holistic Processing Strategy in Cross-Species Face Perception between Dogs and Humans