Abstract:BACKGROUND:Faces are arguably one of the most important object categories encountered by human observers, yet they present one of the most difficult challenges to both the human and artificial visual systems. A variety of experimental paradigms have been developed to study how faces are represented and recognized, among which is the part-spacing paradigm. This paradigm is presumed to characterize the processing of both the featural and configural information of faces, and it has become increasingly popular for testing hypotheses on face specificity and in the diagnosis of face perception in cognitive disorders. METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPAL FINDINGS:In two experiments we questioned the validity of the part task of this paradigm by showing that, in this task, measuring pure information about face parts is confounded by the effect of face configuration on the perception of those parts. First, we eliminated or reduced contributions from face configuration by either rearranging face parts into a non-face configuration or by removing the low spatial frequencies of face images. We found that face parts were no longer sensitive to inversion, suggesting that the previously reported inversion effect observed in the part task was due in fact to the presence of face configuration. Second, self-reported prosopagnosic patients who were selectively impaired in the holistic processing of faces failed to detect part changes when face configurations were presented. When face configurations were scrambled, however, their performance was as good as that of normal controls. CONCLUSIONS/SIGNIFICANCE:In sum, consistent evidence from testing both normal and prosopagnosic subjects suggests the part task of the part-spacing paradigm is not an appropriate task for either measuring how face parts alone are processed or for providing a valid contrast to the spacing task. Therefore, conclusions from previous studies using the part-spacing paradigm may need re-evaluation with proper paradigms.

A featural account for own-face processing? Looking for support from face inversion, composite face, and part-whole tasks

A more featural based processing for the self-face: An eye-tracking study

Association of idiosyncratic eye-movement patterns with holistic processing of faces as measured by the composite face effect and the face inversion effect

The Part Task of the Part-Spacing Paradigm is Not a Pure Measurement of Part-Based Information of Faces.

Two faces of holistic face processing: Facilitation and interference underlying part-whole and composite effects

High Familiar Faces Have Both Part Recognition and Holistic Processing Advantages

Facilitation and interference are asymmetric in holistic face processing

The role of inversion and face masks on simultaneous and delayed face matching tasks

Dissociated Neural Basis of Two Behavioral Hallmarks of Holistic Face Processing: the Whole-Part Effect and Composite-Face Effect

Local Discriminability Determines the Strength of Holistic Processing for Faces in the Fusiform Face Area

The Fusiform Face Area is Engaged in Holistic, Not Parts-Based, Representation of Faces.

Inversion effects reveal dissociations in facial expression of emotion, gender, and object processing

Looking at the Upper Facial Half Enlarges the Range of Holistic Face Processing

Individual Differences in Holistic Processing Predict Face Recognition Ability.

Perceptual Integration and the Composite Face Effect.

What Makes a Face a Face:A Review of Studies on Face Specificity

Influence of Perceptual Discriminability and Spatial Distance on Holistic Processing of Faces

The constancy of the holistic processing of unfamiliar faces: Evidence from the study-test consistency effect and the within-person motion and viewpoint invariance

Priming Global and Local Processing of Composite Faces: Revisiting the Processing-Bias Effect on Face Perception

Interaction Between Social Categories in the Face Composite Task

The Fusiform Face Area Plays a Greater Role in Holistic Processing for Own-Race Faces Than Other-Race Faces