Abstract:A major principle of human brain organization is "integrating" some regions into networks while "segregating" other sets of regions into separate networks. However, little is known about the cognitive function of the integration and segregation of brain networks. Here, we examined the well-studied brain network for face processing, and asked whether the integration and segregation of the face network (FN) are related to face recognition performance. To do so, we used a voxel-based global brain connectivity method based on resting-state fMRI to characterize the within-network connectivity (WNC) and the between-network connectivity (BNC) of the FN. We found that 95.4% of voxels in the FN had a significantly stronger WNC than BNC, suggesting that the FN is a relatively encapsulated network. Importantly, individuals with a stronger WNC (i.e., integration) in the right fusiform face area were better at recognizing faces, whereas individuals with a weaker BNC (i.e., segregation) in the right occipital face area performed better in the face recognition tasks. In short, our study not only demonstrates the behavioral relevance of integration and segregation of the FN but also provides evidence supporting functional division of labor between the occipital face area and fusiform face area in the hierarchically organized FN. Significance statement: Although the integration and segregation are major principles of human brain organization, little is known about whether they support the cognitive processes. By correlating the within-network connectivity (WNC) and between-network connectivity (BNC) of the face network with face recognition performance, we found that individuals with stronger WNC in the right fusiform face area or weaker BNC in the right occipital face area were better at recognizing faces. Our study not only demonstrates the behavioral relevance of the integration and segregation but also provides evidence supporting functional division of labor between the occipital face area and fusiform face area in the hierarchically organized face network.

Local Discriminability Determines the Strength of Holistic Processing for Faces in the Fusiform Face Area

The Fusiform Face Area is Engaged in Holistic, Not Parts-Based, Representation of Faces.

Dissociated Neural Basis of Two Behavioral Hallmarks of Holistic Face Processing: the Whole-Part Effect and Composite-Face Effect

A featural account for own-face processing? Looking for support from face inversion, composite face, and part-whole tasks

Functionally and Structurally Distinct Fusiform Face Area(s) in over 1000 Participants

Functional Connectivity Pattern in the Core Face Network Reflects Different Mechanisms of Holistic Face Processing Measured by the Whole-Part Effect and Composite-Face Effect

Functional Lateralization of Face Processing

Influence of Perceptual Discriminability and Spatial Distance on Holistic Processing of Faces

Functional Relationship Between the Left and Right Fusiform Face Areas

What's behind a face: person context coding in fusiform face area as revealed by multivoxel pattern analysis

Distinct Response Properties Between the FFA to Faces and the PPA to Houses

Individual differences in cortical face selectivity predict behavioral performance in face recognition

What Makes a Face a Face:A Review of Studies on Face Specificity

A Study of Specific Neural Substrate for Face Processing

Individual Face- and House-Related Eye Movement Patterns Distinctively Activate FFA and PPA

The Hierarchical Structure of the Face Network Revealed by Its Functional Connectivity Pattern

The Fusiform Face Area Plays a Greater Role in Holistic Processing for Own-Race Faces Than Other-Race Faces

Functional Dissociation of the Left and Right Fusiform Gyrus in Self‐face Recognition

FFA and OFA encode distinct types of face identity information

Distinct Neural-Behavioral Correspondence Within Face Processing and Attention Networks for the Composite Face Effect.

Perception of Face Parts and Face Configurations: an Fmri Study