Abstract:The effect of normal stress variations on fault frictional strength has been extensively characterized in laboratory experiments and modelling studies based on a rate-and-state-dependent fault friction formalism. However, the role of pore pressure changes during injection-induced fault reactivation and associated frictional phenomena is still not well understood. We apply rate-and-state friction (RSF) theory in finite element models to investigate the effect of fluid pressurization rate on fault (re)activation and on the resulting frictional slip characteristics at the laboratory scale. We consider a stepwise injection scenario where each fluid injection cycle consists of a fluid pressurization phase followed by a constant fluid pressure phase. We first calibrate our model formulation to recently published laboratory results of injection-driven shear slip experiments. In a second stage, we perform a parametric study by varying fluid pressurization rates to cover a higher dimensional parameter space. We demonstrate that, for high permeability laboratory samples, the energy release rate associated with fault reactivation can be effectively controlled by a stepwise fluid injection scheme, i.e. by the applied fluid pressurization rate and the duration of the constant pressure phase between each successive fluid pressurization phase. We observe a gradual transition from fault creep to slow stick-slip as the fluid pressurization rate increases. Furthermore, computed peak velocities for an extended range of fluid pressurization rate scenarios (0.5 MPa/min to 10 MPa/min) indicate a non-linear (power-law) relationship between the imposed fluid pressurization rate and the peak slip velocities, and consequently with the energy release rate, for scenarios with a fluid pressurization rate higher than a critical value of 4 MPa/min. We also observe that higher pressurization rates cause a delay in the stress release by the fault. We therefore argue that by adopting a stepwise fluid injection scheme with lower fluid pressurization rates may provide the operator with a better control over potential induced seismicity. The implications for field-scale applications that we can derive from our study are limited by the high matrix and fault permeability of the selected sample and the direct hydraulic connection between the injection well and the fault, which may not necessarily represent the conditions typical for fracture dominated deep geothermal reservoirs. Nevertheless, our results can serve as a basis for further laboratory experiments and field-scale modelling studies focused on better understanding the impact of stepwise injection protocols on fluid injection-induced seismicity.

Seismicity triggered by fluid injection–induced aseismic slip

INDUCED SEISMICITY. Seismicity triggered by fluid injection-induced aseismic slip

Modeling of Injection Induced Seismic Events

Analyzing 50 years of the Lacq induced seismicity (SouthWestern, France) highlights the role of fluid injection

A laboratory study on fault slip caused by fluid injection directly versus indirectly into a fault: implications for induced seismicity in EGSs

Impacts of Rate of Change in Effective Stress and Inertial Effects on Fault Slip Behavior: New Insights Into Injection‐Induced Earthquakes

Control of Seismicity Migration in Earthquake Swarms by Injected Fluid Volume and Aseismic Crack Propagation

Fluid-driven aseismic fault slip with permeability enhancement and dilatancy

Role of critical stress in quantifying the magnitude of fluid-injection triggered earthquakes

Numerical investigation of the effect of fluid pressurization rate on laboratory-scale injection-induced fault slip

Maximum size and magnitude of injection-induced slow slip events

Cyclic Water Injection Potentially Mitigates Seismic Risks by Promoting Slow and Stable Slip of a Natural Fracture in Granite

Fluid-injection control on energy partitioning during the earthquake cycle

Mitigation of injection-induced seismicity on undrained faults in granite using cyclic fluid injection: A laboratory study

Post-injection normal closure of fractures as a mechanism for induced seismicity

Laboratory evidence for slip evolution of granite fractures due to chemical stimulation in geothermal reservoirs

Changes of Slip Rate and Slip‐Plane Orientation by Fault Geometrical Complexities During Fluid Injection

Transient evolution of permeability and friction in a slowly slipping fault activated by fluid pressurization

Precursory Signals to Injection Induced Fault Reactivation in the Laboratory Using Active Ultrasonic Monitoring Methods

Injection-driven fracture instability in granite: Mechanism and implications

Poroelastic stress relaxation, slip stress transfer and friction weakening controlled post-injection seismicity at the Basel Enhanced Geothermal System