Abstract:In response to China's burgeoning environmental pollution, since 2010, Chinese policymakers have implemented a low-carbon city pilot policy (LCCP) and expanded the pilot project's dimension since then. An accurate evaluation of the consequences of this environmental intervention is vital for the further promotion and extension of this pilot project. In this milieu, we develop a framework to put credibility on this newly intervened policy by harnessing robust econometric approaches. To achieve this objective, we garner integrated data from 2006 to 2014, sourced from two distinct databases: the Chinese Industrial Enterprise database and the China Enterprise Pollution Emissions database. This paper deploys a time-varying Difference in Difference (DID) approach to scrutinize the influence of LCCP on China's emissions reduction agenda from a micro-perspective. The findings reveal that: (1) LCCP significantly reduces enterprise pollution by promoting eco-friendly technologies and innovation capacity; (2) LCCP promotes healthy urbanization and restores the urban ecosystem by abating emissions intensities significantly (i.e., for every one percentage point increase in LCCP, firm-level emissions plummet by 1.87%); (3) LCCP efficacy in controlling emissions varies in terms of ownership, type and location of the firms (i.e., LCCP policy is more efficacious in controlling emissions if the firm is foreign or private-owned if it is a capital and technology-intensive high polluting firm and if the firm is located in eastern and western zones of the country). The findings are robust after replacing the explained variables, changing the estimation method, excluding the interference of outliers, considering the lagged term, and excluding other policy interference. Based on the findings, this study touts the Chinese Government's LCCP policy by providing firm-level theoretical support and empirical evidence for China to boost the revamping strategy of carbon-neutral cities. Therefore, the benefits of pilot cities should be further harnessed to guide enterprises in low-carbon pilot cities so that they can engage in cleaner production activities and achieve green transformation through policy preferences and other incentives. Further policy suggestions have been made in the relevant section.

Low-carbon governance, fiscal decentralization and sulfur dioxide emissions: Evidence from a quasi-experiment with Chinese heavy pollution enterprises

Low-carbon governance, fiscal decentralization, and enterprise green development: Evidence from China

Can low carbon policies achieve collaborative governance of air pollution? Evidence from China's carbon emissions trading scheme pilot policy

Low-carbon city pilot policy and corporate environmental violations: Evidence from heavily polluting firms in China

Can Low-Carbon City Pilot Policies Reduce Environmental Pollution? Evidence From Prefecture-Level Data in China

Low-Carbon City Construction and Corporate Carbon Reduction Performance: Evidence From a Quasi-Natural Experiment in China

How does the low-carbon city pilot policy affect the synergistic governance efficiency of carbon and smog? Quasi-experimental evidence from China

The Relationship Between Fiscal Decentralization and China’s Low Carbon Environmental Governance Performance: The Malmquist Index, an SBM-DEA and Systematic GMM Approaches

A study on the impact of fiscal decentralization on carbon emissions with U-shape and regulatory effect

Is government regulation a push for corporate environmental performance? Evidence from China

Achieving collaborative pollutant and carbon emissions reduction through digital governance: Evidence from Chinese enterprises

Are State-Owned Enterprises Good Citizens in Environmental Governance? Evidence From the Control of Air Pollution in China

The impact of environmental regulation policy on firms' energy-saving behavior: A quasi-natural experiment based on China's low-carbon pilot city policy

How effective has the low-carbon city pilot policy been as an environmental intervention in curbing pollution? Evidence from Chinese industrial enterprises

Can low-carbon cities pilot policy promote enterprise sustainable development? Quasi-experimental evidence from China

Fiscal decentralization, industrial structure upgrading, and carbon emissions: evidence from China

Do Fiscal Incentives Contribute to Pollution Control? Empirical Evidence from China

Carbon emission trading scheme and air quality improvement: evidence from quasi-natural experiment in pilot cities in China

Carbon mitigation performance of top-down administrative and fiscal decentralizations: Evidence from quasi-natural experiments in China's pilot counties

The Impact of Low‐Carbon City Pilot Policy on Corporate Environmental Performance: Evidence from China

The Impact of Low-Carbon City Pilot on Carbon Emissions of High-Polluting Enterprises − Based on Financing Constraint Perspective