Abstract:The fiscal system plays an important role in the government's environmental governance efforts. There is currently no consensus on how fiscal structure adjustments impact pollution and carbon reduction. This paper uses China's fiscal "province-managing-county" reform ( FPMCR ) implemented in 2004 as a quasi-natural experiment, utilizing panel data from 1670 counties in China from 2000 to 2020 to investigate the impact of fiscal decentralization on reduction pollution and carbon emissions ( RPCE ), as well as its underlying mechanisms. The results show that (1) from 2000 to 2020, China's RPCE shows an overall trend of fluctuating increase, with its value turning positive after 2013. China's RPCE exhibits a spatial pattern characterized by "lower in the north, higher in the south; higher in the east, lower in the west". (2) After implementing FPMCR , the RPCE levels in reformed counties decreased by −1.44%, showing that reformed county-level governments prioritize economic development over environmental protection. (3) The mechanism analysis found that after implementing FPMCR , reformed counties experienced a 9.16% increase in nighttime light intensity ( NLI ), and a 3.99% and 4.34% increase in the number of large-scale industrial enterprises ( NLIE ) and industrial agglomeration ( IA ), respectively. This suggests that FPMCR leads to radical urbanization and rapid industrialization in counties, which is detrimental to the improvement of RPCE levels. (4) The spatial heterogeneity analysis found that FPMCR's impact coefficient on RPCE levels in the eastern regions is −1.96%, while in the western regions it is −1.16%. This indicates that reformed counties in the eastern regions are more likely to invest expanded fiscal resources in economic development projects, leading to a decrease in RPCE levels. (5) The temporal heterogeneity analysis found that after the promulgation of the " Three-Year Action Plan to Win the Blue Sky Defense Battle " in 2018, the adverse impact of FPMCR on RPCE is completely reversed, leading to a 1.76% increase in RPCE levels. (6) Further analysis reveals that localizing leaders can slow down the promotion of county-level urbanization and industrialization by the FPMCR , benefiting the improvement of RPCE levels. In other words, "the outsider monk will not recite scriptures as well as a local one". This study has clarified the causal relationship and underlying mechanisms between fiscal decentralization and environmental governance, providing reliable theoretical support for optimizing grassroots fiscal systems and reducing environmental pollution in other transitional economies. It enriches the field of environmental economics related to fiscal decentralization.

Carbon mitigation performance of top-down administrative and fiscal decentralizations: Evidence from quasi-natural experiments in China's pilot counties

Fiscal decentralization, leader localization, and reduction of pollution and carbon emissions —empirical evidence from China's fiscal "province-managing-county" reform

Government fiscal decentralization and haze and carbon reduction: Evidence from the fiscal Province-Managing-County reform

A study on the impact of fiscal decentralization on carbon emissions with U-shape and regulatory effect

Fiscal decentralization, industrial structure upgrading, and carbon emissions: evidence from China

Unintended consequences of administrative decentralization on air pollution: evidence from county power expansion in China

Impact of China’s environmental decentralization on carbon emissions from energy consumption: an empirical study based on the dynamic spatial econometric model

The Relationship Between Fiscal Decentralization and China’s Low Carbon Environmental Governance Performance: The Malmquist Index, an SBM-DEA and Systematic GMM Approaches

Effects of Chinese-style fiscal decentralization on carbon emissions: is there a role for urban construction investment bonds?

Fiscal Decentralization to Promote Carbon Emission Reduction: Based on the Perspective of "Directly Administered Counties"

The role of Chinese fiscal decentralization in the governance of carbon emissions: perspectives from spatial effects decomposition and its heterogeneity

Does fiscal decentralization reduce environmental degradation through mitigating resource mismatch and digital transformation? Evidence from China's resource-based cities

Low-carbon governance, fiscal decentralization and sulfur dioxide emissions: Evidence from a quasi-experiment with Chinese heavy pollution enterprises

Carbon emission trading scheme and air quality improvement: evidence from quasi-natural experiment in pilot cities in China

Fiscal Decentralization, Local Government Behavior, and Macroeconomic Effects of Environmental Policy

Does Administrative Decentralization Enhance Economic Growth? Evidence from a Quasi-Natural Experiment in China

Fiscal Decentralization, Environmental Regulation, and Green Technological Innovation: Evidence from China

How does new energy demonstration city pilot policy affect carbon dioxide emissions? Evidence from a quasi-natural experiment in China

Fiscal centralization and urban industrial pollution emissions reduction: Evidence from the vertical reform of environmental administrations in China

Fiscal decentralization and local environmental governance when performance evaluation Matters

The influence effect of regional carbon emission reduction under the perspective of fiscal decentralization: Government intervention or market mechanism?