Abstract:Feedback from learners is important to support faculty development, but negative feedback can harm teachers' motivation, engagement, and retention. Leaders of educational programs, therefore, need to balance enabling students' voices to be heard with maintaining teachers' enthusiasm and commitment to teaching. Given the paucity of research to explain or guide this struggle, we explored why and how education leaders grapple with negative learner feedback received about their teachers. Using an Interpretive Description methodology, 11 education leaders participated in semi-structured interviews. Discussion was stimulated by showing participants learner narratives they had previously asked to be deleted because they perceived the narrative to be overly critical. Transcripts were iteratively analyzed as codes were developed, refined, and combined into themes. Education leaders interpreted the scope, framing, and focus of the feedback to decide whether it was overly critical. Such determinations were combined with contextual considerations such as the teacher's personal circumstances, the learning environment and how the teacher might react to think through what potential damage the feedback might do to the teacher. Throughout the process, leaders struggled with whether protecting teachers risked not protecting learners and remained unsure about the ethics of censoring student voices. Our study offers direction regarding how to optimize feedback to teachers while minimizing risks inherent in sharing negative feedback with them. Implications include that there is value in: (1) extending feedback interpretation support to teachers, education leaders and learners; (2) situating upward feedback in a coaching dialogue; and, (3) applying the same principles recommended for the provision of feedback to learners, to teachers.

Critical Feedback Characteristics, Teacher Human Capital, and Early-Career Teacher Performance: A Mixed-Methods Analysis

Can Teacher Evaluation Systems Produce High-Quality Feedback? An Administrator Training Field Experiment

An Affective, Formative and Data-Driven Feedback Intervention in Teacher Education

Trainee teachers’ experiences of classroom feedback practices and their motivation to learn

Teacher Feedback Practices, Student Feedback Motivation, and Feedback Behavior: How Are They Associated With Learning Outcomes?

From constructive to critical and everywhere in between: education leaders' decision-making related to harsh feedback from learners about their teachers

The Development of Technology-Enhanced Performance-Based Peer Feedback to Support Teacher Candidate Practice and Child Outcomes

The Nature and Effectiveness of Peer Feedback during an Early Clinical Experience in an Elementary Education Program

Fostering A Teaching And Learning Opportunity: Toward Equity In Student Feedback Of Teaching

Developing teacher feedback literacy through self-study: Exploring written commentary in a critical language writing curriculum

Can Personnel Policy Improve Teacher Quality? The Role of Evaluation and the Impact of Exiting Low-Performing Teachers

Effects of student feedback as a method of self-evaluating the quality of teaching

Student teachers’ perceptions of feedback as an aid to reflection for developing effective practice in the classroom

Constructive Feedback Teaching Strategy: A Multisite Study of Its Effectiveness

A Framework for Teacher Verbal Feedback: Lessons from Chinese Mathematics Classrooms.

Toward Automated Feedback on Teacher Discourse to Enhance Teacher Learning

Giving Feedback on Feedback: An Assessment of Grader Feedback Construction on Student Performance

Roles, relationships and emotions: Student teachers’ understanding of feedback as interpersonal

Do First Impressions Matter? Predicting Early Career Teacher Effectiveness

Teacher feedback literacy, feedback regimes and iterative change: towards enhanced value in feedback processes

Are Teachers Satisfied With Their Evaluations? The Importance of Teaching Context and Trends Over Time