Developing teacher feedback literacy through self-study: Exploring written commentary in a critical language writing curriculum

Emma R. Britton
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asw.2023.100709
IF: 3.9
2023-03-01
Assessing Writing
Abstract:Responding to student writing is complex, as many choices teachers make about the content, delivery, and purpose of feedback often remain beneath the surface of awareness. Incongruencies between teachers' feedback philosophies and practices are therefore common. Here, I analyze my own feedback practices, making a case for self-study as a method to promote teacher feedback literacy. Drawing upon classroom-data from a university developmental English writing context in the Northeastern US, I investigate my feedback practices alongside the implementation of a critical language awareness (CLA) curriculum. Deductively analyzing 301 comments provided to 27 students, I consider commentary's alignment to CLA principles. From this data, I selected five students' writing samples for further analysis, considering their writing development in interaction with CLA commentary. Results indicate some incongruencies between my philosophies and practices, as more than half of commentary showed weaker alignment to CLA principles, and it overwhelmingly addressed essay content (rather than organization or form). Commentary appeared to support the expansion of students' academic writing practices, especially in description, figurative language, argumentation, codemeshing, and source integration. I conclude reflecting on challenges associated with theoretically informed feedback and discuss the study's significance in expanding Lee's (2021) framework for writing teacher feedback literacy.
education & educational research,linguistics
What problem does this paper attempt to address?