Abstract:Anxious about the failure of decisionmakers to significantly reduce ‘the human impact’ on Earth, many global change researchers are looking for ways and means to influence public policy, business strategy and civil society more strongly. As part of this, there is a greater emphasis on understanding and altering the ‘human dimensions’ of global environmental change. A number of physical and society‐environment geographers are involved in this endeavour, building on some valuable past achievements. But what lies ahead? I address this question by examining the rich idea of a ‘social contract’ – one little used in disciplinary debates about Geography's past, present and future, but now relatively common in certain wider discussions of anthropogenic global change. I suggest that there are currents of thinking in contemporary Geography that can offer something both new and much needed in the world of global change research. That ‘something’ is not ever more integrated, accurate analysis of dynamic, coupled human–environment interactions – as if we live in just one world requiring ever more ‘joined‐up’ and granular description, explanation and prediction. Instead, it is an approach to research that eschews ontological holism, epistemological monism and the fact–value dualism. This approach suggests that taking the human dimensions of environmental change seriously requires a new kind of global change research that is at once overtly political and intellectually plural. Far from being a charter for ‘bias’ or ‘relativism’, I show that this approach expresses the rich senses of responsibility, accountability and representation contained in the version of a new social contract I advocate here. A wider implication of my argument is that Geography needs new stories about the nature and merits of ‘intra‐disciplinarity’, ones better attuned to the role of research in fostering democracy in our ‘post‐normal’ times. Thinking afresh about how research should influence society promises to alter many geographers’ sense of self while usefully repurposing global change research across several disciplines.

Developing ‘process pragmatism’ to underpin engaged research in human geography

Will the real people's geography please stand up? Community, public, and participatory geographies in conversation

Geography and the new social contract for global change research

Towards a pedagogical policy turn in geography

Three principles of pragmatism for research on organizational processes

Teaching Research Through Field Studies: A Cumulative Opportunity for Teaching Methodology to Human Geography Undergraduates

Transition, Action and Education: Redirecting Pragmatist Philosophy of Education

PRACTICE MATTERS! Geographical inquiry and theories of practice

Implementing a Problem-Based Learning Approach for Teaching Research Methods in Geography

Pragmatism as a Research Paradigm and Its Implications for Social Work Research

From research-as-practice to exploratory practice-as-research in language teaching and beyond

Challenging ideals of reciprocity in undergraduate teaching: the unexpected benefits of unpredictable cross-cultural fieldwork

Geoethical futures: A call for more-than-human physical geography

Pragmatic GeoAI: Geographic Information as Externalized Practice

From action to transaction: some implications of pragmatism and its concept of agency for development research and practice

Beyond an anthropocentric view of praxis: towards education for planetary well-being

Popular Geopolitics 2.0: Towards New Methodologies of the Everyday

Towards new knowledge complexes for critical geographies of alcohol, drinking, drunkenness

Participatory Knowledge Co-creation: Using Digital Mapping as an Emancipatory Method

Beyond knowledge exchange: doctoral training, collaborative research and reflective pedagogies in human geography