Abstract:Anxious about the failure of decisionmakers to significantly reduce ‘the human impact’ on Earth, many global change researchers are looking for ways and means to influence public policy, business strategy and civil society more strongly. As part of this, there is a greater emphasis on understanding and altering the ‘human dimensions’ of global environmental change. A number of physical and society‐environment geographers are involved in this endeavour, building on some valuable past achievements. But what lies ahead? I address this question by examining the rich idea of a ‘social contract’ – one little used in disciplinary debates about Geography's past, present and future, but now relatively common in certain wider discussions of anthropogenic global change. I suggest that there are currents of thinking in contemporary Geography that can offer something both new and much needed in the world of global change research. That ‘something’ is not ever more integrated, accurate analysis of dynamic, coupled human–environment interactions – as if we live in just one world requiring ever more ‘joined‐up’ and granular description, explanation and prediction. Instead, it is an approach to research that eschews ontological holism, epistemological monism and the fact–value dualism. This approach suggests that taking the human dimensions of environmental change seriously requires a new kind of global change research that is at once overtly political and intellectually plural. Far from being a charter for ‘bias’ or ‘relativism’, I show that this approach expresses the rich senses of responsibility, accountability and representation contained in the version of a new social contract I advocate here. A wider implication of my argument is that Geography needs new stories about the nature and merits of ‘intra‐disciplinarity’, ones better attuned to the role of research in fostering democracy in our ‘post‐normal’ times. Thinking afresh about how research should influence society promises to alter many geographers’ sense of self while usefully repurposing global change research across several disciplines.

Towards a pedagogical policy turn in geography

Decolonising pedagogies in undergraduate geography: student perspectives on a Decolonial Movements module

Will the real people's geography please stand up? Community, public, and participatory geographies in conversation

Geographic contributions to institutional curriculum reform in Australia: the challenge of embedding field-based learning

Navigating personal and disciplinary frontiers: engaging with undergraduate geography students' reflections on their geographical education

Developing ‘process pragmatism’ to underpin engaged research in human geography

Putting Geography Education into Place: What Geography Educators Can Learn from Place-Based Education, and Vice Versa

Geography and the new social contract for global change research

Promoting Lifelong Professional Development in Geography Education: International Perspectives on Developing the Scholarship of Teaching in Higher Education in the Twenty-First Century

Evolving curricula and syllabi – challenges for physical geography

Geoethical futures: A call for more-than-human physical geography

Toward a new energy paradigm in geography: revisiting the curriculum and teaching practices

Geography Education for Sustainable Development

Restructuring physical geography

Teachers envisioning future geography education at their schools

Embedding Research-Based Learning Early in the Undergraduate Geography Curriculum

Achieving Human Potential Through Geography Education: A Capabilities Approach to Curriculum Making in Schools

The perspectives of geography, and geography teaching, in secondary pre-service teachers in Czechia

Geography and moral education in a super complex world: The significance of values education and some remaining dilemmas

Teaching Research Through Field Studies: A Cumulative Opportunity for Teaching Methodology to Human Geography Undergraduates