Abstract:The article is the second part of the study of the evolution of the Frankfurt School theoretical views in the context of the history of Marxism and the development of the «left idea» in the 20th century. The central point is the degeneration of «critical theory» into a conformist quasi-liberal-democratic conception that retains only a distant formal relationship with Marxism. It is shown how the critical attitude and radical negativism of the first generation of the Frankfurt School in the second generation gradually turn to a recognition that an alternative to liberal democracy and the capitalist economy is absent. Combined with the shaped in the 1950s rejection of Soviet Marxism and the USSR, which considered as a form of poorly disguised totalitarianism that fetishized labor and state power and abandoned freedom and reason in favor of domination and effective exploitation, the political conformism of the employees of the Institute for Social Research in Frankfurt am Main led to their actual break with Marxism. There was a rejection of both the main plots and approaches to their interpretation — economic relations, class struggle, dialectical materialism, etc. — and the Marxist language itself: the second generation of the Frankfurt School does not use Marxist terminology and abandons the Marxist discourse. The critical attitude from the universal metaphysical, as it was in Adorno, is reborn into an morally-epistemological one: it acquires objective limitations and means not pure negativity, but something opposite — a reflexive readiness to be wrong, a willingness to discover a mistake. In J. Habermas and A. Honneth, the critical attitude approaches the critical rationalism of K. Popper and turns from revolutionary into conformational — now it is a tool for creating social harmony and improving, rather than destroying the social order. In this way, the method defeats the truth, declaring it impossible, but in the end turning into an endless, unsolvable promise of approaching an unattainable truth, which cannot be, but which can be imagined. The theoretical (“critical”) work that leads nowhere ultimately benefits the existing order — in full accordance with Marcuse’s ideas about a one-dimensional society, but in a diametrically opposite modality for the second generation of the Frankfurt School: now this is a reason not for horror, but for optimism.

On Marxism, Pragmatism and Critical Urban Studies

The Critical Awareness of the Modernity of Marxist Philosophy ——From the perspective of human nature

Critical analysis of Marxist ideas in modern urban planning

From Philosophy to Social Theory of Critique——Post-Philosophical Interpretation of Marx's Theory

On Practicism of Marxist Theory

On Analytical Marxism’ Turn to Political Philosophy

A Study of Marxism's Thoughts about Practical Humanism and the Contemporary Qualities of Literary Theories

Introducing Marxist Literary Criticism

A Shift of Paradigm and a Change of Subject, the Evolution of Marxist Practical Philosophy

Marxist State Theory in a Globalized Age

On Key Features of Critical Social Theory of Marx

Developing ‘process pragmatism’ to underpin engaged research in human geography

Method Versus Truth. Part 2. The Schism with Soviet Marxism and Transformation of Frankfurt School's Discourse

Pragmatism as a Research Paradigm and Its Implications for Social Work Research

Adorno and Marcuse at the Barricades?: Critical Theory, Scholar-Activism, and the Neoliberal University

On Classical and Neo-Analytic Forms of Pragmatism

Kant Is a Bridge to Marx

What is Marxist geography today, or what is left of Marxist geography?

Exploration of the Disciplinary Significance of Marxist Social Theory

The Methodology of Historical Materialism and Its Academic Significance: Starting with the Criticism of Some Social Critical Theories in the West

A Contemporary Thinking on the Methodological Change of Marxist Theories on Social Development