Absorption of toluene in silicone oil: Effect of the solvent viscosity on hydrodynamics and mass transfer

Maxime Guillerm,Annabelle Couvert,Abdeltif Amrane,Edith Norrant,Nicolas Lesage,Éric Dumont
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cherd.2015.12.028
IF: 4.119
2016-05-01
Chemical Engineering Research and Design
Abstract:The purpose of this study was to compare toluene absorption performances using two PDMS of different viscosities (η=5 and 50mPas, respectively) in terms of hydrodynamics and mass transfer. Three types of packing were tested in a counter-current packed gas–liquid contactor, Raschig rings, IMTP®, and Flexipac®. Hydrodynamic results showed that the viscosity of PDMS 50 is not a hurdle to be used with IMTP® or Flexipac®; the pressure drop being around 288Pam−1 for Flexipac® at the flooding point (FG=0.99Pa1/2; L′=4.95kgm−2s−1), which corresponds to an acceptable value for an industrial application. The determination of the loading zones showed that Raschig rings were not suitable for solvents having a high viscosity, such as PDMS 50; they resulted in high pressure drops if compared to IMTP® and Flexipac®. The mass transfer study showed that 100% removal efficiency can be reached for both PDMS using Flexipac®. For IMTP®, the removal efficiency is limited to 88% in the presence of PDMS 50. As a result, PDMS 50 should be a relevant absorbing liquid for the removal of toluene in the absorption–biodegradation process, and Flexipac® packing should be preferred to IMTP®.
engineering, chemical
What problem does this paper attempt to address?