Abstract:Abstract Objective Ensuring proper respirator fit for individuals remains a persistent challenge in occupational environments, yet there is limited knowledge about how respirators interact with the face to “‘fit.” Previous studies have attempted to understand the association between face dimensions and respirator fit using traditional head/face anthropometry not specifically tailored for respirators. The purpose of this study was to assess and compare the ability of filtering facepiece respirator (FFR)-specific face anthropometry with traditional head/face anthropometry in exploring the relationship between facial dimensions and the fit of FFR. Methods The study utilized 3D face scans and quantitative fit factor scores from 56 participants to investigate the relationship between face anthropometry and FFR fit. Both FFR-specific and traditional anthropometric measurements were obtained through 3D anthropometric software. Intra-correlation of anthropometry was analyzed to evaluate the efficiency and effectiveness of FFR-specific and traditional anthropometry respectively. Principal component analysis (PCA) was conducted to test the usefulness of the PCA method for investigating various facial features. Logistic regression was used to develop fit association models by estimating the relationship between each face measurement set and the binary outcome of the fit test result. The prediction accuracy of the developed regression models was tested. Results FFR-specific face anthropometry consists of a set of measurements that can inform the detailed facial shape associated with the FFRs more effectively than traditional head/face anthropometry. While PCA may have been effective in reducing the variable dimensions for the relatively large parts of the human body such as upper and lower bodies in previous literature, PCA results of FFR-specific and traditional anthropometry were inconsistent and insufficient to describe face dimensions with complex anatomy in a small-detailed area, suggesting that facial shape should be understood through a variety of approaches including statistical methods. Logistic regression analysis results confirmed that the association models of FFR-specific face anthropometry were significant with higher prediction accuracy and had a better model’s goodness of fit than those of traditional head/face anthropometry in 3 conditions inputting all measurements, all PC scores, or top 5 measurements from PCA. Conclusions The findings showed that the FFR fit association model enables an understanding of the detailed association between face and respirator fit and allows for the development of a system to predict respirator fit success or failure based on facial dimensions. Future research would include testing the validity of the model and FFR-specific measurement set on different respirator types, expanding the population set, and developing an integrated approach using automated and machine learning technologies to inform FFR selection for occupation workers and the general population.

The Importance of Fit-Testing Particulate Filtering Facepiece Respirators!

Face anthropometry for filtering facepiece respirators: analysis of the association between facial dimensions and respirator fit

A comparative study of point-of-care protection from N95 filtering face-piece respirators in a Residential Aged Care Facility and a Tertiary Hospital—Respiratory protection challenges remain amidst long-term impacts of COVID-19

Reusable respirators as personal protective equipment in clinical practice

Under-mask beard covers achieve an adequate seal with tight-fitting disposable respirators using quantitative fit testing

Systematic experimental comparison of particle filtration efficiency test methods for commercial respirators and face masks

Evaluation of a point-of-use kiosk for improving the fit of N95/P2 respirators in health care settings: A randomized controlled trial

Comparison of fit factors of medical workers wearing foldable medical respirators and analysis of influencing factors

Filtration Efficiency of Hospital Face Mask Alternatives Available for Use During the COVID-19 Pandemic

Personalized 3D-printed frames to reduce leak from N95 filtering facepiece respirators: A prospective crossover trial in health care workers

Fit-Tested N95 Masks Combined With Portable High-Efficiency Particulate Air Filtration Can Protect Against High Aerosolized Viral Loads Over Prolonged Periods at Close Range

N95 respirator seal integrity following extended-use by healthcare workers in the intensive care unit: A cohort study

Navigating Performance Standards for Face Mask Materials: A Custom‐Built Apparatus for Measuring Particle Filtration Efficiency

A Critical Review on the Experimental Setups Used to Assess the Efficiency of Respirators Against Ambient Particulate Matter

Effectiveness of Fit Check Methods on Half Mask Respirators

Infra-Red Imaging to Detect Respirator Leak in Healthcare Workers During Fit-Testing Clinic

The Filtration Efficiency of Single-Layer Textiles for Respiratory protection

Face masks and respirators in the fight against the COVID-19 pandemic: An overview of the standards and testing methods

Evaluation of a New Workplace Protection Factor-Measuring Method for Filtering Facepiece Respirator

Comparison of Two Methods for Sterilization of Filtering Facepiece Respirators Worn for Extended Periods During the COVID-19 Pandemic: An Experimental Laboratory Study

Qualitative fitting characteristics of elastomeric half face-piece respirators using Isoamyl acetate agent