Abstract:<h3>Importance</h3><p>Procuring respiratory protection for clinicians and other health care workers has become a major challenge of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic and has resulted in nonstandard practices such as the use of expired respirators and various decontamination processes to prolong the useful life of respirators in health care settings. In addition, imported, non–National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH)-approved respirators have been donated or acquired by hospitals as a potential replacement for limited NIOSH-approved N95 respirators.</p><h3>Objective</h3><p>To assess fitted filtration efficiencies (FFEs) for face mask alternatives used during the COVID-19 pandemic.</p><h3>Design, Setting, and Participants</h3><p>For this quality-improvement study conducted between April and June 2020, we used the Occupational Safety and Health Administration's Quantitative Fit Testing Protocol for Filtering Facepiece Respirators in a laboratory atmosphere supplemented with sodium chloride particles to assess the FFEs of a variety of respirators worn by a male volunteer and female volunteer.</p><h3>Main Outcomes and Measures</h3><p>The FFEs of respirators commonly worn by clinicians and other health care workers and available respirator alternatives during the COVID-19 pandemic.</p><h3>Results</h3><p>Of the 29 different fitted face mask alternatives tested on 1 man and 1 woman, expired N95 respirators with intact elastic straps and respirators subjected to ethylene oxide and hydrogen peroxide sterilization had unchanged FFE (>95%). The performance of N95 respirators in the wrong size had slightly decreased performance (90%-95% FFE). All of the respirators not listed as approved in this evaluation (n = 6) failed to achieve 95% FFE. Neither of the 2 imported respirators authorized for use by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention that were not NIOSH-approved tested in this study achieved 95% FFE, and the more effective of the 2 functioned at approximately 80% FFE. Surgical and procedural face masks had filtering performance that was lower relative to that of N95 respirators (98.5% overall FFE), with procedural face masks secured with elastic ear loops showing the lowest efficiency (38.1% overall FFE).</p><h3>Conclusions and Relevance</h3><p>This quality-improvement study evaluating 29 face mask alternatives for use by clinicians interacting with patients during the COVID-19 pandemic found that expired N95 respirators and sterilized, used N95 respirators can be used when new N95 respirators are not available. Other alternatives may provide less effective filtration.</p>

N95 respirator seal integrity following extended-use by healthcare workers in the intensive care unit: A cohort study

A comparative study of point-of-care protection from N95 filtering face-piece respirators in a Residential Aged Care Facility and a Tertiary Hospital—Respiratory protection challenges remain amidst long-term impacts of COVID-19

Fit Test Failure During N95 Respirator Reuse and Extended Use

Reusable respirators as personal protective equipment in clinical practice

Fit-Tested N95 Masks Combined With Portable High-Efficiency Particulate Air Filtration Can Protect Against High Aerosolized Viral Loads Over Prolonged Periods at Close Range

Filtration Efficiency of Hospital Face Mask Alternatives Available for Use During the COVID-19 Pandemic

Comparison of Two Methods for Sterilization of Filtering Facepiece Respirators Worn for Extended Periods During the COVID-19 Pandemic: An Experimental Laboratory Study

Filtration performance and breathing resistance of elastomeric half mask respirator P100 filter cartridges after repeated and extended use in healthcare settings

Modifying NIOSH's Manikin Fit Evaluation Method to Match Fit Testing with Human Subjects

Impact on the fitness of N95 masks with extended use/limited reuse and dry heat decontamination

Comparison of the inward leakage rate between N95 filtering facepiece respirators and modified surgical masks during the COVID-19 pandemic

Fit Test for N95 Filtering Facepiece Respirators and KF94 Masks for Healthcare Workers: a Prospective Single-center Simulation Study

Personalized 3D-printed frames to reduce leak from N95 filtering facepiece respirators: A prospective crossover trial in health care workers

The Importance of Fit-Testing Particulate Filtering Facepiece Respirators!

Quantification and influence factor analysis on total inward leakage of N95 respirators by simulating healthcare professional's procedures

Evaluation of a point-of-use kiosk for improving the fit of N95/P2 respirators in health care settings: A randomized controlled trial

Assessment of the Psychometric Properties of the Mask Usability Scale: A Measure of the Perceived Usability of N95 Respirators Among Healthcare Students and Staff

Effects of Prolonged Use of Facemask on Healthcare Workers in Tertiary Care Hospital During COVID-19 Pandemic

Under-mask beard covers achieve an adequate seal with tight-fitting disposable respirators using quantitative fit testing

Benchtop Assessment of Sealing Efficacy and Breathability of Additively Manufactured (AM) Face Masks

P2/N95 respirators & surgical masks to prevent SARS-CoV-2 infection: Effectiveness & adverse effects