Abstract:: For a long time, China’s grassroots mass self-governance organizations, represented by urban community residents’ committees and rural villagers’ committees, as the important main body of social governance activities, have to a certain extent deviated from their functional “self-governance” function due to the “administrative” tendency in their institutional inertia. As modern social governance attaches greater importance to multi-factor participation and multi-dimensional cooperation in governance activities, the concept of governance that synergizes “self-governance and shared governance” has been given high priority in the governance of China's urban and rural communities, and has become a key element in the “common building, common governance and shared sharing” social governance system and governance system of the times, which is highly characteristic of socialism with Chinese characteristics. The concept of “self-governance and shared governance” has been highly valued in the governance of urban and rural communities in China, and has been embodied in the modernization of the social governance system and governance capacity, which is very characteristic of the socialist era with Chinese characteristics. In this process, the Party’s leadership has been consistently applied throughout the entire process and in all aspects of grassroots governance; the political function of community Party organizations has been continuously strengthened; the leading role of grassroots Party organizations and the pioneering and exemplary role of Party members have been fully brought into play, leading to the high-quality development of community governance; democratic self-governance of the grassroots in the community has been effectively promoted, and grass-roots practice of people’s democracy in the entire process has been perfected; importance has been attached to fostering the professional qualities of community workers, and to upgrading the professional qualities of community leaders represented by neighborhood and village committees. The way to develop and improve China’s practice of community governance in the new era is paying attention to fostering the professional qualifications of community workers and improving the self-governance capacity of grass-roots mass self-governance organizations represented by neighborhood committees and village committees.

Study on Transformation of Trade Union Function based on Grassroots Governance Modernization

From Manipulation to Integration: the Strategic Transformation of Grassroots Control in China

In-Between State and Society: A Study of the Dual Governance Mechanism of Trade Unions

Trade Union's Role in Labor Relations:An Empirical Analysis of Zhejiang Province

Political Risk of Centralization and the Vertical Separation of Powers:Reform of Contemporary Social Management System from a Historical Perspective

To View Trade Union Work in Universities in the Perspective of Serving Personal Development and Build up Harmonious Campus

Country and Society Interact:The Path Choice of Urban Grassroots Governance

Study On Transformation Of Government Functions In The Development Of China'S Land Market

A Study of Organizational Transition of the Ruling Party from the Perspective of Social Governance

Multiple Social Networks in Grassroots Governance in Rural China

Institutional Change of Farmer Cooperative Economic Organization in the Perspective of Policy Network

Led by the Party Building: The Construction of Urban and Rural Community Governance System Under the Concept of Self-governance and Co-governance

Union Organizing in China: Still A Monolithic Labor Movement?

Community Governance in Transitional Urban China

Research on Information-Based Governance of Party Construction in Grass-Roots Communities

The Role of Trade Unions under Corporatism Model

Gain Approach:Analysis of the Pattern of Political Participation of Trade Union Congress

Democratic Localism: the Case of Grassroots Self-Governance in Urban China

A Theoretical Study on the Effectiveness of Grassroots Social Governance

Enterprise Union: the Dynamic Actor——Taking union practice of a joint venture in Beijing, B Co. Ltd., as an example

A Study on the Logic and Path of Urban Governance Based on Negotiation