Abstract:: For a long time, China’s grassroots mass self-governance organizations, represented by urban community residents’ committees and rural villagers’ committees, as the important main body of social governance activities, have to a certain extent deviated from their functional “self-governance” function due to the “administrative” tendency in their institutional inertia. As modern social governance attaches greater importance to multi-factor participation and multi-dimensional cooperation in governance activities, the concept of governance that synergizes “self-governance and shared governance” has been given high priority in the governance of China's urban and rural communities, and has become a key element in the “common building, common governance and shared sharing” social governance system and governance system of the times, which is highly characteristic of socialism with Chinese characteristics. The concept of “self-governance and shared governance” has been highly valued in the governance of urban and rural communities in China, and has been embodied in the modernization of the social governance system and governance capacity, which is very characteristic of the socialist era with Chinese characteristics. In this process, the Party’s leadership has been consistently applied throughout the entire process and in all aspects of grassroots governance; the political function of community Party organizations has been continuously strengthened; the leading role of grassroots Party organizations and the pioneering and exemplary role of Party members have been fully brought into play, leading to the high-quality development of community governance; democratic self-governance of the grassroots in the community has been effectively promoted, and grass-roots practice of people’s democracy in the entire process has been perfected; importance has been attached to fostering the professional qualities of community workers, and to upgrading the professional qualities of community leaders represented by neighborhood and village committees. The way to develop and improve China’s practice of community governance in the new era is paying attention to fostering the professional qualifications of community workers and improving the self-governance capacity of grass-roots mass self-governance organizations represented by neighborhood committees and village committees.

Country and Society Interact:The Path Choice of Urban Grassroots Governance

Multiple Social Networks in Grassroots Governance in Rural China

The Land-lost Farmers and Local Government: Grassroots Governance in China’s Urban-Rural Peripheries

Led by the Party Building: The Construction of Urban and Rural Community Governance System Under the Concept of Self-governance and Co-governance

The Direct Election of the Urban Residents Committee and the Urban Grassroots Governance

A Theoretical Study on the Effectiveness of Grassroots Social Governance

Research on the Characteristic Model and Practice of China's Urban Grassroots Social Governance Model

Exploring the Path of Modernization of Urban Community Governance

Community Governance in Transitional Urban China

Village Elections, Grassroots Governance and the Restructuring of State Power: An Empirical Study in Southern Peri-urban China

Innovation of Grassroots Governance in China:Investigation and Comparison in Macro Framework

Structural Transformation and Governance Mechanism on Urban Community Governance

Optimization of Rural Governance Structure under the Development of New Agricultural Management Entities

Democratic Localism: the Case of Grassroots Self-Governance in Urban China

Multi-dimensional superposition: Rural collaborative governance in Liushe Village, Suzhou City

Why is Governance Invalid at the Grass Roots of Society?

The Evolution of Rural Governance System in China and Its Influences to Rural Spatial Planning

Research on Rural Grassroots Party Organizations Leading Rural Governance under Rural Revitalization Strategy

Innovative Development and Practice of Digital Rural Governance Model Based on Green Ecology

Exploring Innovative Structures and Mechanisms in Urban Grassroots Governance: A Network Governance Perspective

A Study of the Mechanisms of Government Embedment and Organizational Environment Related to Supervisory Effectiveness in the Collective Governance of Rural Residential Land