Visible and Invisible Bodies and Subjects in Peter Damian

William Burgwinkle
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-137-11451-8_3
2004-01-01
Abstract:Peter Damian is not the first figure that comes to mind when compiling a list of medieval queer theorists. Though he is often cited as a key figure in the formulation of the sin of sodomy and as an innovator in disciplinary discourse, he is not usually considered an advocate for what I would call, following Foucault, a queer aesthetics of the self.1 Yet when grated against Leo Bersani’s Homos, specifically against Bersani’s reading of André Gide, Peter emerges as an important theorist of male communities whose views resonate uncannily with Foucauldian concerns about the power and fantasy of control through sight and the disciplinary effects of being seen.2 The Peter Damian in question is, of course, the author of the by now infamous Liber gomorrhianus [Book of Gomorrah], probably the first comprehensive guidebook to Christian homophobia, but also of the De laude flagellorum [In Praise of Flagellation], a work of incredible daring which he wrote in the last years of his life. Both works were written in a defensive mode, as justification for his own versions of the Law and as public denunciations of those who had other ideas. It would not, in fact, be inaccurate to call them angry texts, Peter himself having confessed that anger was the one vice he could never truly extirpate.3 The Gomorrhianus was written as an open letter to Pope Leo IX in 1049, and the Flagellorum around 1070.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?