Entre Chien Et Loup: Henry James, Queer Theory, and the Biographical Imperative

Eric Savoy

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230288881_6

2007-01-01

Abstract:Henry James formally became a gay writer in 1991 when he was “outed,” if you will, by Edmund White, the editor of The Faber Book of Gay Short Fiction. The publisher’s timing was exactly right: Faber capitalized on the growth of a coherent and self-identified gay readership—and on the rise of academic gay studies, which required anthologies for its proliferating courses—and found its ideal editor in Edmund White who, at the peak of his career as a gay novelist and critic, possessed the cultural authority to establish a definitive gay canon. From the perspective of the James critical industry, it was nothing short of momentous that White decided to begin his chronological unfolding of gay fiction with James’s story “The Pupil,” which he chose, perhaps, because it appeared exactly a century before White’s exercise in canonical legitimation. (Literary historiography likes to organize itself in terms of centuries, a temporal measure on which it can impose a certain teleological order.) Readers who expected a story about homosexuality were frankly puzzled by White’s choice of “The Pupil” for their initiation; by the light of late twentieth-century categories of identity, there are no “homosexuals”—according to our current understanding of this identity-category—in James’s fiction. Disgruntled students, echoing Gertrude Stein, complained “there’s no there there.”