Abstract:Corrective feedback with its potential role in oral interaction, and teacher’s questions with the capacity to engage the learners in conversational activities led to the investigation of their roles in speaking accuracy of EFL learners. Teacher’s display and referential questions were employed along with explicit (explicit correction, metalinguistic clue, elicitation) and implicit (conversational recast, repetition, clarification request) corrective feedback to create opportunities for the learners to participate in interaction, to modify their errors, and to produce accurate output. Therefore,112 learners who attended 10 intact classes of 15 session terms in one control and four experimental groups were homogenized through administering a PET. In all groups, accuracy was focused while learners were engaged in conversational activities. In the first and second experimental groups teacher’s display questions were implemented followed by the provision of explicit and implicit feedback types. However, the third and fourth experimental groups were asked to answer teacher’s referential questions who received explicit and implicit corrective feedback respectively. To measure the learners’ speaking accuracy, both pre and posttests of speaking were recorded and transcribed to estimate the percentage of error free clause. An analysis of covariance indicated that in learners’ speaking accuracy; both teacher’s display and referential questions with either explicit or implicit feedback types were significantly effective; there were no significant differences between the effectiveness of teacher’s display and referential questions with explicit corrective feedback; and teacher’s referential questions were significantly more effective than display questions with implicit feedback types. The substantial enhancement of EFL learners’ speaking accuracy bears testimony that in interactional view, communicative behavior resulting from the questioning and corrective feedback paves the way for a higher level of accurate output.

THE IMPLEMENTATION OF IMPLICIT CORRECTIVE FEEDBACK THROUGH RECORDINGS TOWARDS EFL STUDENTS IN LISTENING AND SPEAKING ENGLISH CLASS: CASE STUDY

EXPLORING IMPLICIT CORRECTIVE FEEDBACK PREFERENCES ON STUDENTS’ SPEAKING PERFORMANCE

EFL Students' Perceptions towards Lecturer's Corrective Feedback in Speaking Class

EFL Students’ Responses on Oral Corrective Feedbacks and Uptakes in SpeakingClass

Corrective Feedbacks and Their Impacts To Learners’ Uptakes In EFL Speaking Class

INVESTIGATING THE USE OF EFL TEACHERS’ ORAL CORRECTIVE FEEDBACK IN SPEAKING CLASSES

Learners' Perceptions on the Use of Oral Corrective Feedback in One-to-One EFL Classroom

The Implementation of Effective Online Asynchronous Corrective Feedback on the Oral Production of English as a Foreign Language Learners in University Virtual Speaking Classes

The Effectiveness of Positive Feedback in Teaching Speaking Skill

Oral Corrective Feedback and Error Analysis: Indonesian Teachers’ Beliefs to Improve Speaking Skill

Investigating Students Attitudes on Oral Corrective Feedback: Small-scale Survey in Academic Speaking Class

Navigating Teacher’s Display and Referential Questions to Enhance Learners’ Speaking Accuracy: A Case of Explicit and Implicit Corrective Feedback

STUDENTS’ PERCEPTIONS TOWARDS ORAL CORRECTIVE FEEDBACK IN A SPEAKING CLASS

Identifying EFL Learners’ Uptakes in Response to Corrective Feedback

Analysing teacher’s feedback used by an English teacher of EFL in senior high school

HOW ORAL CORRECTIVE FEEDBACK IS PERCEIVED BY EFL BILINGUAL ELEMENTARY SCHOOL TEACHER

Corrective Feedback and Learner Uptake:The Case ofEFL Classrooms

EFL Learners’ Corrective Feedback Decision-Making in Task-Based Peer Interaction

The Urgency of Oral Corrective Feedback in English Language Teaching: Students and Teachers’ Perception

EXAMINING STUDENTS’ ORAL CORRECTIVE FEEDBACK PREFERENCES FOR IMPROVING SPEAKING PROFICIENCY

TEACHING SPEAKING: EXPLORING METHOD OF TEACHING AND ORAL CORRECTIVE FEEDBACK IN EFL LEARNERS’ CLASSROOM